Sigma DP3 Merrill
Announced January 8, 2013
PixelMeter The PixelMeter is our 1–100 aggregate of reviewer scores from trusted publications and creators. Weighted by source tier — not a raw average, and not PetaPixel’s own review.
Reviewer Consensus
Good
The Sigma DP3 Merrill pairs a specialized 75mm equivalent macro lens with a 46-megapixel Foveon sensor to produce exceptional image detail and color accuracy. While it delivers gallery-quality results, the camera is hampered by slow performance, poor battery life, and a restrictive fixed-lens design.
Weighted from 7 reviewer scores
Pros
- Outstanding image quality with sharp detail and rich color reproduction
- Sharp 75mm equivalent macro lens
- High-quality, solid metal construction
- Clear and high-resolution rear LCD screen
Cons
- Slow autofocus performance and sluggish operation
- Extremely limited battery life requiring frequent changes
- Cumbersome file storage and buffer limitations
- Restrictive fixed focal length and lack of modern video features
- Poor high-ISO performance and image noise
- Launch price $1,400 (USD)
- Sensor 46MP APS-C Foveon
- Video 1080p 0p
What the Reviewers Say
All 7 expert reviews, weighted into the PixelMeter score.
Is this product missing a reputable review? Share a link to a review article or YouTube video for consideration.
-
As with the DP2 Merrill, the DP3 Merrill is a little gem, with improved firmware.
-
The new DP3 Merrill completes Sigma's compact camera range by incorporating a 75mm equivalent lens and useful macro capabilities, with the DP Merrill family now offering 28mm, 45mm and 75mm lens options.
-
The Sigma DP3 Merrill packs a 46-megapixel Foveon image sensor and a fixed 75mm macro lens.
- Photo Review 9/10
As the most specialised of the three DP Merrill cameras, it’s a very special camera for photographers with special requirements. There’s really no other camera that fits into the same niche. For this niche, it merits our Editor’s Choice award.
-
In the end, a knowledgeable photographer could use the Sigma DP3 Merrill to capture gallery quality images with a little practice.
-
Without doubt, a high level camera but the ISO problem is a serious deterrent for me.
-
If you have to have the ultimate image quality in as small a package as possible, there’s no other option – and I think the compromises simply aren’t that much of an issue when compared to the alternatives. I might actually pick up one for myself.
