Best of all, it's less expensive than the model it replaces.
Best of all, it's less expensive than the model it replaces.
If you plan to use it for classic video production, shooting continuously for no more than about 10 minutes, it's great — better than other models in its price range, though Panasonic's S5 is close.
If you've got the budget and want the best APS-C mirrorless camera on the market, then I'd highly recommend the X-T4.
Yes, it is an excellent camera for pro and serious amateur wildlife and action photography, particularly if you want something compact.
[I] wasn't disappointed with the EOS RP's performance as it more or less delivered what I expected for the price. However, Canon has made some bizarre decisions here.
Panasonic's S1 is the real deal, delivering both fantastic photo and video quality. In most areas — including low-light sensitivity, stabilization and dual-card redundancy — it stands up to and surpasses rivals from Sony, Nikon and Canon.
The A6400 is not much of an upgrade over the A6300, other than the flip-up screen. It retains many of the pluses of its predecessor, like fast shooting speeds and 4K video, along with the disadvantages, including a lack of in-body stabilization and excessive rolling shutter.
Between Nikon and Canon, I'd have to give the trophy here to Nikon. Discounting the higher resolution of price, the Nikon Z 7 is a better all-round camera.
In all, the X-T3 is a triumphant return to form for Fujifilm. Even with the new X-Trans sensor, improved autofocus, and higher shooting speeds, it would still be a winner, but Fujifilm outdid itself on video, vaulting the X-T3 to the top of the APS-C mirrorless podium.
Without a doubt, the Hero 7 has a lot more to offer than the Hero 6. With the price remaining at $399, it's an easy decision if you were already considering plunking down some cash on a flagship GoPro.
Despite those issues, the Fujifilm X-H1 does excel where it counts with solid performance and consistently great images and video, and you won't be disappointed if you buy one — as long as you know what to expect.
As much fun as it's been to shoot with, and even though it's one of the best-performing cameras I've ever used, I'm not too sad to be saying goodbye to the X-Pro2.
At $680 for the body only, Canon's EOS M3 is worth the money — and that's something I couldn't have said about either of its predecessors.
It's not the best NEX camera; the NEX-6 adds quite a few features that that make it more appealing overall, but it is quite a bit more expensive, so for $500 you really can't go wrong with the Sony Alpha NEX-3N.
The NEX-F3 is an excellent mirrorless ILC, but it's not the best entry-level camera — not even from Sony.
