In the meantime, if you really need the S1R's ruggedness, excellent handling and video capability, then it's worth a look.
In the meantime, if you really need the S1R's ruggedness, excellent handling and video capability, then it's worth a look.
[I] wasn't disappointed with the EOS RP's performance as it more or less delivered what I expected for the price. However, Canon has made some bizarre decisions here.
Panasonic's S1 is the real deal, delivering both fantastic photo and video quality. In most areas — including low-light sensitivity, stabilization and dual-card redundancy — it stands up to and surpasses rivals from Sony, Nikon and Canon.
The A6400 is not much of an upgrade over the A6300, other than the flip-up screen. It retains many of the pluses of its predecessor, like fast shooting speeds and 4K video, along with the disadvantages, including a lack of in-body stabilization and excessive rolling shutter.
Between Nikon and Canon, I'd have to give the trophy here to Nikon. Discounting the higher resolution of price, the Nikon Z 7 is a better all-round camera.
In all, the X-T3 is a triumphant return to form for Fujifilm. Even with the new X-Trans sensor, improved autofocus, and higher shooting speeds, it would still be a winner, but Fujifilm outdid itself on video, vaulting the X-T3 to the top of the APS-C mirrorless podium.
Without a doubt, the Hero 7 has a lot more to offer than the Hero 6. With the price remaining at $399, it's an easy decision if you were already considering plunking down some cash on a flagship GoPro.
The Sony Alpha A7 III might not have the highest resolution, fastest shooting speed or best video quality.
Despite those issues, the Fujifilm X-H1 does excel where it counts with solid performance and consistently great images and video, and you won't be disappointed if you buy one — as long as you know what to expect.
As much fun as it's been to shoot with, and even though it's one of the best-performing cameras I've ever used, I'm not too sad to be saying goodbye to the X-Pro2.
At $680 for the body only, Canon's EOS M3 is worth the money — and that's something I couldn't have said about either of its predecessors.
It's not the best NEX camera; the NEX-6 adds quite a few features that that make it more appealing overall, but it is quite a bit more expensive, so for $500 you really can't go wrong with the Sony Alpha NEX-3N.
The NEX-F3 is an excellent mirrorless ILC, but it's not the best entry-level camera — not even from Sony.
