PetaPixel

Photographs Captured Over Years with an Open Camera Shutter

German photographer Michael Wesely has spent decades working on techniques for extremely long camera exposures — usually between two to three years. In the mid-1990s, he began using the technique to document urban development over time, capturing years of building projects in single frames. In 1997, he focused his cameras on the rebuilding of Potsdamer Platz in Berlin, and in 2001 he began photographing the Museum of Modern Art’s ambitious renovation project. He uses filters and extremely small apertures to reduce the amount of light striking the film, creating unique images that capture both space and time.

Wesley says that his technique could be used for even longer exposures of ten, twenty, or even forty years. You can learn more about Wesley and view his list of exhibitions over on his website, or purchase the book he created from this Open Shutter project.


Image credits: Photographs by Michael Wesely


 
 
  • Fred

    Wow, love that.

  • http://www.freeboprich.com/ freeboprich

    Spectacular, I can’t stop looking at them!

  • snem

    A quake will kill your years-long project…

  • http://profiles.google.com/slimspidey Spider- Man

    This guy wins the game of photography!

  • http://twitter.com/bigjfoot Jeremy McMahan

    I don’t know if it’d kill it… A few stray photons for 5
    minutes wouldn’t ruin a 2-year exposure—as long as the camera came back to
    rest in the same exact spot. Interesting thought exercise to consider the
    ramifications though.

  • MikeAlgar42

    I want to see this in EXTREME LARGE! They are so incredible detailed and mind fuckery. It is a really interesting experiment and documents that urban sprawl well. Especially the idea of reaching towards the sky in big cities and industrialistion. Imagine doing this from this point now to 30 years down the line on a greenbelt somewhere just on the outskirts of a city.

  • Mantis

    Agreed.  I’d love to see large prints of these…

    …hanging inside my own house.

  • http://www.facebook.com/philiphan Philip Han

    I was contemplating beginning a project based on Hiroshi Sugimoto’s Long Exposures as I do Astrophotography and Time Lapse Photography. I also love my Holga 120 Wide Pinhole Camera! So I decided to do extreme long-exposures and of course I go to PetaPixel and the first article has to be the very same idea I had Hahaha

  • Kesha Webster9

    those are some cool freaking pics

  • http://twitter.com/stoyanov stanimir stoyanov

    Does anybody know if the original photographer is selling prints?

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1461716423 Dale Bender

    Ghostly-looking!! Try this with a digital camera you new tech droids!!!

  • Freddy K

    It could be done with digital too – you just take one image once a while, eventually align them using a tool like Hugin, and average them all.

    In any case, the main ingredient is patience, technology doesn’t matter so much. With digital, you could also watch the progress, which makes it a bit easier though.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Daniel-Esquibel/100001394913926 Daniel Esquibel

    It’s called Solargraphy & I’ve been a solargrapher for a year & half now. However Michael Wesely is the King of Solargraphy & his method is unknown to almost every solargrapher!

  • http://rigu.co.uk/ Andrew Bowness

    Been a solargrapher for a year and a half? So you’ve taken one or two pics then? Kidding!

    Is it something you build up to (day long exposures, then a week, then a motnh…) I can’t imagine being brave enough to start out with a year-long exposure in case I did something wrong.

  • Al Bartkus

    And 1 minor earthquake or tremor could mess up a year long exposure lol. 

  • Hchord

    Perhaps not.  Considering the size of the aperture, a few hours of jostling would only have a minor effect on the film since the total length of exposure required to capture the image is exponentially larger, by comparison.

  • http://twitter.com/JessieKPhoto Jessie Kaufman

    I’m  confused. How did they change the battery?

  • http://www.facebook.com/TylerJBranston Tyler James Branston

    No battery. shot on film. manually open and close the shutter. 

  • Jes

    This kind of anti technology attitude was prevalent when photography was beginning too, people then believed nothing could replace painting… BTW film or digital sensor would make very little difference (apart from needing a reliable power source to keep the sensor active) as the technique relies on filters and tiny apertures.

  • hostile_17

    But it’s jut not the same without some sepia filter added by an app or something…

  • quickpick

    must have been great fun to invent and execute such an idea, but there’s not that much a multiple exposure and photo editing with layers wouldn’t do.. kudos anyhow for the effort, they are very good looking pictures no matter what!

  • http://www.flyingsuicide.net/ Oj0

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but f/32 and three ten-stop ND filters should allow you to get this? A ten-stop filter lets through 1/1024 the light, so by the second one you’re looking at 1/1,048,576 the light and by the third one it’s 1/1,073,741,824 of the light. Using Sunny 16 and an aperture of f/32 you’re looking at an exposure time 4,294,967,296 times longer than 1/100, or 42,949,672.96 seconds. That’s 497.1 days without accounting for the darkness of night. Unless I’m off, I’m surprised. Before I put any thought into it, I was imagining something more like f/500 with a dozen filters.