PetaPixel

Review: f-stop Gear’s Loka UL is Feather Light and Feature Rich

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1439

Today the good folks at f-stop Gear have launched their new Loka UL backpack. This further extends their Mountain Series lineup of backpacks and is one more example of how f-stop Gear won’t sleep on progress.

The Loka Ultralight is their rally sport edition of the ever popular Loka. It’s sleeker and lighter without sacrificing any of the horsepower the original Loka is known for.

In the few months I’ve had with the newly launched Loka UL from f-stop Gear I’ve had a couple of revelations. One: they’ve been open since 2006 and I’m just hearing about them now? And two: freedom!

Expanding on the latter: it’s that gift of liberation from the backpack gods. They’ve punished me with lovely yet impossibly heavy backpacks for my entire career. Packs that even without a hint of photography equipment were starting out at damn near 7lbs or more.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1243

I’m sure you’re already familiar with this problem. Finding a good fitting pack, one that’s truly capable of not only protecting our lenses through rugged terrain but aiding in our constant pursuit to make a good photograph, is a difficult task. Commonly, you end up on one extreme or the other: comfortable and durable or designed solely for the photographer, lacking any input from the pencil pushes over in the ergonomics department.

f-stop Gear have solved this. Freedom is at hand. And I’ll let you in on something else: they solved it a long time ago.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1234

Back country mountain men and women have been digging the f-stop camera back system for some time, and the endless vocal support found on many message boards speaks volumes about the quality you get for your money. A streamlined revision of the original Loka, the new Loka UL will be the eighth bag in the Mountain Series.

First and foremost for current subscribers to the f-stop way of life, it’s still an ICU backpack. Nothing changes in this department, but for the uninitiated this may cause you to grumble a little. If you’re fluent with f-stop Gear’s lineup, feel free to skip a few paragraphs, you already know why that grumbling is unnecessary.

With a price point of around $250 for the bag alone, stare another $60 to $100 in the face for an Internal Camera Unit (or two) and that $250 quickly becomes almost $400. If this sounds like a lot, then you’ve obviously not shopped for a professional grade backpack this decade.

Left to right: Shallow ICU medium w/ 70-200, Shallow small w/ D700+24-70, XL Pro ICU w/ D3+300mm 2.8 and 70-200 across the top.

Left to right: Shallow ICU medium w/ 70-200, Shallow small w/ D700+24-70, XL Pro ICU w/ D3+300mm 2.8 and 70-200 across the top.

When you get right down to it, the f-stop Gear ICU methodology is comparatively inexpensive. If you’re the kind of person who does various activities each requiring their own bag type then the flexibility afforded by the ICUs is priceless. The task of repacking from one bag to another is one a lot of photographers deal with daily.

It’s tiresome, risky and something’s always missed. Eventually you’re on a job that requires your Magic Arm and it’s in your roller… at home.

loka-ul.0314.D31_1713

The most appealing part of the ICU system is its customization factor, it is off the charts. There’s no end to the level of adjustments and packing options with the ICUs. It’s positively my most favorite aspect of all the f-stop Gear Mountain Series camera backpacks.

As I’ve said before, I’m all over the place. One day it’s a three-hour hike with the goal of shooting a specific set of photos and getting the hell out of there. The next it’s a full day hike with plans to eat breakfast, lunch and supper beside the campfire.

When you factor those two features against the less than free wheeling competition, the choice may become easier for you. Having a full-sized Large ICU and a Small ICU lets you go whole hog or half hog, depending on your needs. No need to change backpacks, just swap the ICU.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1211

With that out of the way, lets finally get to the bag. It’s light. It’s Muhammad Ali light. Floating like a butterfly on your back while you sting photos like a bee.

My first experience hiking with it, packed with a Nikon’s D800, 300mm f/2.8, 24-70 and 14-24 and I actually said to a friend “I’ve forgotten I have a backpack on.” He carried it for the next 200 yards or so and had the same sentiments. Keeping the comparisons going while glancing at the weight of several other bags in the same class as the Loka Ultralight, and they all weigh in at between two and six pounds heavier.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1372

In effect, the Loka UL is just like any other backpack you might find. It has all the pockets in all the right spots and includes an internal aluminum frame to better distribute the load on your back. Furthermore, with a plethora of attachment points, additional pieces of gear such as skis, hiking poles or even a snowboard can easily be loaded.

Also, kudos to f-stop Gear for doing something I love and putting the hip belt buckle on the left padded waist arm instead of placing it smack dab in the middle of the belt. The hard plastic waist buckle on every bag I’ve ever owned will somehow always find a way to stab me and no one needs that.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1288

It has space for a hydration bladder and the forward facing port for the tube to come out. You access your camera gear via the flappy door also acting as your back padding. The hydration bladder fits inside a sleeve on the interior, backside of the ICUs. Good just in case it leaks.

The ICUs themselves can be jammed in via the back door or via the secret (OK, not so secret but it was a few days before I’d discovered it) opening at the top, which allows for the ICUs to be slipped in without needing any muscle.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1251

Besides the big compartment for your gear, there’s a top pouch perfect for a little grub, a first-aid kit and some tools. Your go-to bits-n-bobs that you could need at a moment’s notice. A second vertically zippered pouch finds itself smack dab in the middle of the pack’s mid-section. It isn’t large but I found it just right for a pair of gloves and heat packs.

The only thing I found myself wanting was a small convenience pouch on either hip belt arm, their absence further driving home f-stop’s drive to go ultralight.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1360

Besides the ICU components, f-stop Gear also has a line of small single lens barrel cases called “Dakota Component System” that are designed to be affixed on the exterior of your pack should you need to free up a little internal space.

I personally love these because, should I want to leave my pack at camp after a long hike, I can stick one on my belt, rolling out quicker and lighter than when I came in.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1240

To answer a burning question for all of those current Loka owners, “Do I upgrade to the Loka Ultralight?” the answer isn’t simple. Firstly, the objective differences are weight and weather/terrain proofing. The Loka UL is lighter than its big brother by almost one and a half pounds but still has the same 37L capacity.

As I’ve alluded to already, the UL = ultralight and boy is it ever. Now, 1.5lbs isn’t a lot, except when you’re shaving it from a meager 3.45lbs to begin with. That’s nearly 40% trimmings.

But that weight reduction comes at the cost of resiliency. In my experiences with the Loka UL I’ve been impressed. I was caught in a heavy downpour without a rain cover and on open terrain. Up sh*t creek as they say. Once I got to cover, I didn’t find one drop inside the Loka UL.

Yes I had sprinted the quarter-mile but I would suspect it’s more to do with the Durable Water Repellent treatment and PU2 coating f-stop Gear apply to the backpack. While not advertised as “waterproof” I see no reason for alarm in at least short bursts of torrential rain, reaching for the cover only when guaranteed a day long Wet-n-Wild-esque affair.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1433

Another aspect of resilience is physical abuse and damage. If you’re scaling mountain sides with sharp shale and jagged edges all baying for camera-bag-blood, then perhaps the Ultralight version of the Loka isn’t for you. Its featherlight nature is certainly more susceptible to a gash than its heftier sibling. I had good experiences with it in tight brush, actually blazing through thicker trees with an aggressive pace that — more than once — had me certain I’d punctured a new and unneeded hole in the side of my Loka UL.

I was wrong. It stood up quite well against my torture tests and I suspect long term it’ll be plenty strong for even the more adventurous PetaPixel readers. Being made of 210D ripstop nylon is a major component to long term durability and though it may not survive a 100ft fall off the side of a mountain, few bags would.

Conclusion

It’s rare for me to take this quickly to a camera bag of any shape or size. More times than I’d care to admit, a newly purchased backpack will find itself stashed in my closet for a month. Working that new gear into your routine can be a difficult task at times. Suddenly, the waist belt pocket you’d grown to love is absent and the hydration tube comes out over your left shoulder, not your right.

It’s the little quirks that sometimes conspire to become a full-blown case of the ‘ARRGGH!’s.

loka-ul.0414.DSC_1318

The Loka UL and I? We didn’t skip a beat. This might come across as a sell, but it isn’t. Trust me. I’ve never before felt a backpack intended for all day use feel so right from the start.

The one moment I keep coming back to — and certainly annoyed my friends with — was that first day when I had the realization that I’d forgotten about the nearly 10lbs of gear on my back. With any other bag I own that would have been 15 to 20lbs because of the standard weight of a photographers hiking backpack.

Though adventure photography oriented Loka UL isn’t without its caveats and yes, the initial investment may seem daunting for a newbie, it must be stated loud and clear: the payoffs are worth every single penny.

Available only in the black with blue accent you see above, pre-order has opened today. I wouldn’t sleep on this if you’re considering the Loka UL as your 2014 summer backpack, as the popularity of f-stop Gear’s bags very frequently outstrips supply.


 
Get the hottest photo stories delivered to your inbox.
Get a daily digest of the latest headlines:
  • Mosley Hardy

    What options does it have for carrying a tripod?

  • ntm

    you can attach it to the exterior side, via bottom mesh pouch and side straps. These bags are the best kept secret out there.

  • sinhtruong

    Side or front with the “GateKeeper” straps

  • Aezreth

    I have the Tilopa BC, fantastic bags.

  • Andy Austin

    I’m a travel/adventure photographer, I have had my F-stop Tilopa BC for over a year now and love it. It’s so well thought out and has everything I could need.

    But I do have a few criticisms of F-stop as a company. One is that they nickel and dime you to death. I spent near $500 for my Tilopa and one ICU. The ICU’s are vastly over priced. Heck I could get a whole pack from a lot of places for the cost of a single ICU. Also, no accessories are included. So if you want rain cover it’s an extra $22, gear straps are an extra $15. It’s stuff like this that should just be included for the steep price of the bag.

    Also the colors. Don’t get me wrong, that Maliblu Blue they’ve been having as an option is one of my favorite colors in the world. But I don’t want my pack to be that color. So having this pack only available with the only option is the blue accents is too much for me. I spend a lot of time in seedy areas all over the world. I love my all black F-stop Tilopa BC because it looks like a normal pack and doesn’t scream photography. Anything I can do to not scream “rob me!” I’ll do it. So bright blue just doesn’t work for me.

    With that said I don’t regret dropping as much as I did on F-stop and I’d do it all over again.

  • gochugogi

    Haha, at least the accents aren’t red or orange! I use a black sharpie to “restyle” such careless details. Albeit it’s probably the Western tourist/traveler vibe that does most of the “rob me” screaming. They’d go for you even if you were wearing a JanSport daypack stuffed with TP.

  • Cynical Bloke

    They are just copying another brand. Best kept secret I don’t think so.

  • Cynical Bloke

    Shame the depth is possible too deep for carry on and Those straps look too thin to be comfortable with heavy loads. I’ll stick with my think tank. Way cheaper, light, and comes with a rain cover.

  • jypfoto

    Maybe it’s just me, but I like the black/blue accents, it makes it more distinctive than a typical all black bag. I was looking to get a Loka in black when I read about a Loka UL coming out. Now that I see it, I like that it’s not just a simple all black. I showed 5 of my co-workers, none of whom are photographers and each of them said that they prefer the new UL color as opposed to the all black Loka. I agree, it has more character and isn’t just a plain jane bag. Then again I don’t travel to dangerous parts of the world where I would be mugged.

  • TSY87

    I totally agree with everything you said. I LOVE my Tilopa bag, but they sure are expensive. They really should include the rain cover and stuff with the bag though.

  • Graham Welland

    I have the current Loka and it’s actually one of the few bags that ALWAYS fits in the overhead compartment even on a commuter jet. The design of the bag makes it almost impossible to overpack or bulge unlike many others.

  • Filip Wolak

    How about fitting a 15″ MacBook Pro? Doable? Comfortable?

  • Cynical Bloke

    It says 27cm deep in specs, that won’t fit in all overhead compartments and if measured would be checked in. My think tank is 22cm and most of the time just fits.

  • Graham Welland

    I’ve flown over 200k miles with my Loka in all types of aircraft including notoriously fickle airlines like Lufthansa and Icelandair and have never had an issue with fitting the bag in their templates. Remember that the specs are the MAX dimensions when fully stuffed with gear in the rear pocket etc. In normal use it’s slimmer than 27cm in my experience.

  • Aezreth

    I agree about the nickel and diming, it’s pretty ridiculous that accessories are not included at this price point. Also, I think the ICU interiors could be much better quality considering how much they cost, my Tamrac is better in that regard. But, all considered, it’s still the best backpack I’ve ever used.

  • Cynical Bloke

    Doubt it, get a bag with a dedicated section, this doesn’t even look like it has good back cushioning since that is the main opening for your gear.

  • Cynical Bloke

    Another thing, it’s not ultralight at 2kg!

  • Guest

    What other brand? Can’t think of many brands offering variable sized inserts, MOLLE attachment straps, internal frame, and rear access in 2007.

  • sinhtruong

    bag weighs 1kg. 2.25lbs, however the weight can be more depending on the insert you choose.

  • Guest

    depending on the insert. With a shallow, it’ll fit along with a padded/neoprene sleeve.

  • Guest

    A lot of negative words for somebody who has never used the bag.

  • Cynical Bloke

    That is because it is a joke of a review, it’s more like an advert it’s ridiculous. It’s like the guy has been using a backpack from the 80s. I love he says it isn’t a sell, rem yes it is! The backpacks I use not only hold more equipment, are lighter and will survive a fall down a mountain.

  • Graham Welland

    Cynical Bloke is enamored with his Think Tank so this is likely a futile discussion especially if facts are involved ;)

  • Graham Welland

    The laptop section is under the rear pocket on the pack. The section with the flap is padded and very comfortable. If needed there’s additional padding in the lid (and sides) of the ICU.

    Probably shouldn’t bother feeding the naysaying troll :)

  • timerickson

    Just curious: Why is rear access preferred? What does it have over side access or, front access?

  • Techrod

    1) Security – back access makes furtive entry into the main part of the sack impossible when you are wearing it.
    2) Comfort – you can lay the front side of the sack on a muddy or wet ground and then put the sack back on your back without transferring mud to your clothes.

  • Mark

    You show the XL Pro ICU and discuss carrying the 300/2.8 kit etc shown in the XL Pro. Does the XL Pro fit in to the Loka? The F-Stop website suggests that the two are not compatible