not for publication
Hi Michael, I love peta pixel, please don’t take the following note in the wrong way
PP used to be a fun place filled with original content and delight. the editorial standards were high and set a high bar for other blogs to follow.
I wonder if you noticed that over the last few weeks, the content has degraded and site focus has changed.
There are three things that I noticed, I don’t know if they disturb you or any of the other readers, but I thought to turn your attention to them, just in case this was not intentional.

1. There is almost no original material any more, and surfing PP approximates RSS-aggregating fstoppers, KEH , the top reddit list and a few other blogs.
2. Some images in use (like boxing arena) are not used within their CC license, a CC image that has the no $ sign, can not be on a money making blog. CC licensing is not simple, so I thought to turn your attention to that.
3. Lastly, lots of via tags at the end of posts are missing. I assume you surf the web too, and find interesting things to share, which is great. That said, stuff that has been all over the news, should definitely get a via.
And the last thing, which is less critical in my mind, re-postings. No point in taking content from a different page, be it a blog post, an instructible or a reddit discussion and simply reposting it here. I mean it is already on the web, it would be more fair to let the readership know the original location of the content and provide the originator with the deserved traffic. Just saying.

I know this may not be easy to read. however, I am positive that you can take the message and and make the most out of it for the wonderful peta pixel community.

with respect,
a loyal reader

what iso film is appropriate for the given exposures?

I hate it!!! It’s so boring to watch and complicaed!!!