PetaPixel

Review: Canon’s 200-400mm f/4L IS 1.4x Stretches Focal Length and Wallets

lens pic copy

If camera manufacturers were high school boys, building super telephoto zooms would be their equivalent of a pissing contest to see who can shoot the farthest or most accurately. Sports photographers would arrive at the stadium packing the biggest lens to win bragging rights, acting like Arnold Schwarzenegger slinging his Gatling gun in Terminator. But Canon’s super telephoto zoom, the EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM, is getting long in the tooth, and it’s time to say, “hasta la vista, baby” to that lens.

Introducing the latest Jericho missile from Stark Industries

Introducing the latest Jericho missile from Stark Industries

For wildlife photographers and photojournalists, Canon has announced the new Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x lens (what a mouthful!), which we will henceforth refer to as the “Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L”.

Weighing a hefty 3.6kg (8lb) in the red corner, this challenger packs 25 elements in 20 groups and measures 36.6cm (14.5”) in length. Like other new Canon super telephoto lenses, it is weather sealed and features ring-type ultrasonic motors with full-time manual focus override.

Unfortunately Canon has been very late to the super telephoto zoom party. Nikon has been strutting its stuff on the dance floor with its Nikkor AF-S 200-400mm f/4 G lens since 2003 (and Mk II since 2010), so if Canon wants to arrive fashionably late it must bring along a special friend: a built-in 1.4x extender that stretches its maximum focal length to 560mm.

Think of it as a nitrous oxide (NOS) boost in a drag race, giving it instant power up over its rivals, except this one is legal.

The equivalent of a NOS button on a race car

The equivalent of a NOS button on a race car

Canon’s party trick of integrating a teleconverter is a world’s first, and the execution is brilliant. The extender (what Canon calls a teleconverter) resides in a small bump when not in use, and you simply slide a switch for the additional 8 elements in 4 groups to swing into the optical path, giving you 1.4x more reach at the expense of 1 stop light loss.

Balancing a super telephoto lens on a monopod while mounting an extender (especially in the rain or dust) is like mud wrestling a pig. It can be done, but you are going to get dirty and sweaty, and you will break something in the process.

Sliding a switch to effortlessly activate the built-in extender on the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L, on the other hand, makes you feel like James Bond in a tricked-out Aston Martin. Ladies will be stirred, and your opponents shaken.

The inclusion of a built-in extender is a brilliant idea for a super-telephoto zoom, giving you a seamless range from 200mm up to 560mm at the flick of a switch. To illustrate the flexibility of the focal length range, I shot same scene below with the wide-end of 200mm and at its longest reach of 560mm. With just a flick of a switch and a twist of the zoom ring, you can switch between shooting an entire herd or a close-up of an individual.

From a wide shot…

From a wide shot…

To a tight close-up.

…to a tight close-up.

There are more controls on the lens than Darth Vader’s chest piece, letting you select the autofocus range and image stabilizer mode. Canon’s latest super telephoto L lenses feature the Power Focus (PF) mode, which is of special interest to moviemakers to drive the autofocus electronically for a smooth and quiet focus during movie recording. The Force is strong with this one…

3 modes of Image Stabilization to choose from

3 modes of Image Stabilization to choose from

Power Focus (PF) is a new feature on latest L lenses

Power Focus (PF) is a new feature on latest L lenses

Build quality is extremely sturdy as one would expect from a Canon L super telephoto lens, and it balances well on a monopod or tripod. At 3.6kg (8lb), the lens is a gloriously expensive way to train your biceps, but the zoom lens replaces three lenses simultaneously to justify its hefty weight.

Your muscles will whine from the lactic acid onslaught, but it gets better with time. It is heavy, but the golden question is – is it worth its weight?

The image quality of the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L is, in a word, excellent. Even when shot wide-open at f/4 or f/5.6, the contrast and sharpness of the lens is very good.

Actually it is gob-smacking amazing for a lens with 25 elements (or 33 elements if you activate the built-in extender). Consider that the Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM or EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM has only 16 elements each, it is nothing short of an engineering feat for the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L to deliver such stellar performances with twice the number of elements!

duck 1 copy

duck 2 copy

Autofocus is very fast and decisive, even on the EOS 5D Mk III body. With a long lens like this, having a vertical grip goes a long way in keeping the set-up steadier while making it easier to shoot in portrait orientation.

Another useful tip for shooting with such long telephoto focal lengths is to keep your shutter speed high to avoid image blur due to the extreme high magnification. The Image Stabilizer alone will not help much with subject movement, so a safe shutter speed will be 1/350th second or faster with this lens.

lion copy

lizard copy

Now that we’ve established the sharpness of the lens, the question in everyone’s mind doubtlessly is: does the built-in extender degrade the sharpness of the optics? And I will let the photos to do the talking…

dragonfly copy

dragonfly crop copy

yellow bird copy

yellow bird crop copy

These images were shot at 560mm with the extender activated at the 400mm focal length. You can clearly see the details on the bird’s feather, as well as the intricate designs on the dragonfly’s wings. That is some truly amazing detail from the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L! Out of the 1586 images I shot, more than two-thirds (1149 images) were shot with the extender engaged. “Sharpness” is the middle name of the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L.

chroma copy

Chromatic aberrations not detectable

Chromatic aberrations not detectable

flamingo copy

parrot copy

So the Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x lens is very sharp, very fast with autofocus and very versatile in terms of focal length. But it is not perfect. Other than its weight (did I say its hefty?), the lens vignettes slightly wide-open, and it seems to flare when provoked by strong lighting from the side (although the generously deep lens hood goes a long way to mitigate this issue). And if you are new to the lens, there can be some confusion over the focus and zoom rings due to their close placement to each other.

The biggest problem, though, is the price. At $11,799, it is breathtakingly more expensive than its Nikon rival. Granted the Nikon does not have built-in extender, but that must be one hell of a teleconverter for a $5,000 premium!

What are the alternatives then? Well, you could buy the combination of EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM ($2,499), Extender EF 2x III ($499) and the EF 300mm f/2.8L IS II USM ($6,799), which gives you a faster f/2.8 set-up and you’d still end up saving $2,000. The downside is a missing gap between 200-300mm focal range, and missing opportunities during the time taken to swap lenses and teleconverters.

Are the missed shots worth the premium price? At the end of the day, it’s your call.

meerkat copy

parakeet copy

To be completely honest, I couldn’t wait to return the lens on the first day that I brought it out. The Canon EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x is a lens that should come with a mule as an accessory (although, the weight is quite manageable if you are not moving it around too much).

However, that evening as I reviewed my photos on the computer, every ounce of misgiving evaporated as I reviewed the images. Crisp, tack sharp and contrasty, the photos are what I would never have expected from a super telephoto zoom with an extender.

The pricing of the lens mirrors its super telephoto focal length — it’s a long stretch! But once you have experienced the versatility of a seamless 200-560mm focal range and the high quality images from the lens, you will understand why Canon priced the EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x lens at exactly what it is worth.


About the author: Nelson Tan is a photographer based in Singapore. You can contact him through his Facebook, blog, and his photo gallery.


 
 
  • Mansgame

    Even as a Nikon guy I have to say this is a thing of beauty.

  • PocitoMustacio

    Man, I wish I could justify purchasing this. New car or new lens? Decisions, decisions…

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/James-Conner/100000343007259 James Conner

    There are not many working photographers who can afford a lens so expensive yet so limited in application. This is for big-time sports and events shooting from a bullpen using a heavy tripod. I do have some concern about reliability given the number of moving parts; about flare given the number of optical surfaces; and about reduced light transmission given the number of lens elements (what is the t-stop?).

  • Mansgame

    I don’t think there is anyway a normal person can justify this unless they either use it every week for pay or are independently wealthy and dropping $7000 is a minor amount of money.

  • Mike

    I sold my kids.
    They weren’t as sharp.

  • Nate Parker

    I must have one!

  • http://www.ameridane.org/ thingwarbler

    Agree; in fact, when the article quotes the press release as “For wildlife photographers and photojournalists, Canon has announced…” I have to ask: what the hell are wildlife photographers being paid these days?!? As a photojournalist I would absolutely love this lens, but my accountant would disown me if I told him I’d dropped $12K on a single piece of equipment like that. In a market where editors are consistently dropping their rates and assignments are getting harder to come by, this thing is like a Lamborghini delivery van: sexy as hell and wildy desirable, but just not practical or feasible for the supposed target audience.

  • jkantor267

    “once you have experienced the versatility of a seamless 200-560mm focal range and the high quality images from the lens, you will understand why Canon priced the EF 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x lens at exactly what it is worth.”

    Brown-nose much?

  • Genkakuzai

    Looks great, for sure!

  • Johan Elzenga

    This lens is not more expensive than a 2.8/400mm or a 4.0/600mm, but I guess nobody uses those lenses either? Funny, if I look at the photographers behind the goal of a professional football match I somehow get a different idea…

  • http://www.ameridane.org/ thingwarbler

    Oh, sure, lots of people use those classic long lenses — usually owned by an agency or employer who could justify the expense because they do enough events to justify it. When I worked for the AP even stringers could check out the fancy stuff for assignments. But that was in part because the AP could buy a lens like that and then share it among all their photographers. Lots of bang for their buck.

    Canon isn’t stupid — presumably they figure there are enough people/agencies out there with the buying power required to buy this new toy, too. I’m just not one of them. If I’m hired to shoot a ballgame at a rate that can justify it, I’ll rent one of those big babies for the day — but if the new 200-400 weighed in at, say, $4-5K instead of $12K I might be able to justify buying it and making some great pix.

    So, this is all really just broke-man’s butt-hurt whining, nothing more nothing less. If Canon can sell this enough of these at $12K then they should surely do so — all the more power to them and to the lucky photographers who have that kind of money floating around.

  • Yukikaze

    To make that price more palatable they should make a version without the built in teleconverter and price it at around 6-7K. Should take away a fair amount of weight too.

  • http://steamcommunity.com/profiles/76561198051596340/ Traingineer

    Just like Gabe Newell: Worth the weight (wait).