This Holga Camera is Worth $24,000

This Holga camera is named the “Holga-Cam of the Apocalypse” and is worth $24,000. Photographer Mike Martens created it using a Holga 120N camera body worth $25 and a Phase One P25 digital back worth $24,000. The two components are fused together using a horseman lens board (hence the camera’s name) and a foot of black gaffer’s tape. The camera shoots low-fi photographs at 22 megapixels. You can find more images of the camera here and sample photographs shot with it here.

(via Photon Detector)

Get the hottest photo stories delivered to your inbox.
Get a daily digest of the latest headlines:
  • Sean McCormack

    I’ll stick with a Holga lens on my Olympus Pen.. 

  • Those sample photos are crap. Is it that hard to take decent pictures?

  • Alex Masters

    Unless he purchased a P25 – brand new – with the sole intention of mounting it on a Holga, there is no way in hell that camera is ‘worth’ 24k. The P25 is as old as time itself, and I sincerely doubt a superior back (IQ140) would fetch 3k less out of the box. Factor in the age and the number of clicks and you’re looking at a 7k door stop.

    If you’re going to go out of your way to make such crap, at least use one of the old Kodak backs – then you can be pretty damn sure your back won’t out resolve your glass.

  • Alex Masters

    Aside: off to turn my Rollei GX into a digital TLR.

  • nik

    The bokeh for me is not that good.. i dunno.. but the element or the feel of the normal bokeh seem to be lacking in some of its picture.. plus the color fringing.

  • Dave Nunez

    And by ‘glass’ you mean ‘plastic’…
    Also, the photos on Flickr are from 2007

  • Zane

    Man, what a crazy thing to see pop up out of the blue! Mike did this several years ago — this kit probably would have cost that much then — with a new Holga but a rented back. I was there when he was putting it together but never had a chance to play with it myself.

  • Spider- Man


  • Jesse

    The film is at least 50% of the charm of a Holga shot. So these shots are 50% less creative, inspirational and charming — at least to me.

  • Guest


  • OSAM

    There really are no words.

  • Az Photo Mac

    Think I’ll stick with my D700 and 24-70… I can get just as good results and still have money left over to buy a few other trinkets :)

  • djaimes

    It’s like a mullet – business in the front, party in the back

  • Spider- Man

    You win this round of comments DJ ;)

  • Kok Leong

    wow, who would buy it?

  • Mikekemp F5

    He just answered the question that no one asked.

  • Bownephoto

    chi chi idea..REALLY MUDANE photos….so what was the point?

  • Flgraphics

    well the photos are less then thrilling

  • Dave

    Surely this was an April Fool’s Day  post, no?

  • pmonk

    So this is/was my handiwork, and I wanted to drop in and say thanks for the link.At the time, I was working in a photo rental department, so don’t worry … I didn’t spend $25,000 to build this thing. And yes, the value has certainly dropped, but with a P65+ on it, you could still have a $40,000 Holga camera today. (Hmmmmmm…) 

    It’s admittedly a stupid idea. But I’ll say this, if you get the chance to try something like it … it’s fun. And it might not be the easiest way to gain an appreciation for camera engineering (both the simplicities and complexities of it), but it’ll give you that.

  • Duke Shin

    (the $25 Holga)