• Facebook

    500 K / likes

  • Twitter

    1 M / followers

2 Affordable Films for Photographers on a Budget

Comment

It’s time to give some long-overdue love to two cheap films in price, but by no means in quality. It can be tempting to go for the expensive films when you’re out buying rolls of 35mm, but let’s not forget about the bottom of the shelf.

The films you are going to read about have some serious advantages on top of their inexpensive price.

If you are just starting out with film photography, it may be a good opportunity to practice without breaking the bank; however, if you already have some experience, you can always try these two guys and compare the results to the more famous films you are used shooting. I’m sure they won’t have anything to be ashamed of!

Color Film

We are going to start with the color one, but before I reveal the name of this film, let’s look at a few pictures.

Image by Halfrain
Image by [email protected]

The pictures above were taken with Agfa Vista. It costs less than $5 per roll on Amazon, but you can often find it as little as $1.50 per roll (24 frames) in dollar stores or Poundland in the UK.

To my knowledge, this film exists in two different speeds: 200 and 400. They both offer the same characteristics and classic 90’s vintage look. It produces exactly the type of images (along with Kodak Gold) that reminds me of my youth. You know the kind of photo with high saturation and warm tones that we all have in our old albums? Ah… the good old days!

Back to the present, let’s talk grain: it’s almost non-existent when shot in bright light, but can be slightly more present when used in low light conditions. For me, it’s not really an issue as you can expect most films to be grainy in low light, so not a big deal here.

The only downside I can think of is that it can make the blues look a bit magenta. It’s more noticeable on the darker shades of blue as you can see below. I guess it can be reduced by overexposing by one stop if you don’t mind loosing a bit of detail in the highlights.

Overall, we have here a film that’s very saturated, with reasonable grain in most lighting conditions, and it won’t cost you an arm and a leg… or even just an arm.

The only thing you’ll have to deal with is that light magenta cast in some shades of blue. If you are a fanatic of blue sky pictures, it may not be the right film for you; otherwise, go for it and have fun. It’s a fantastic film and you will have a hard time finding better for this price.

Black and White

I saved the best one for last. This is by far my favorite black and white film. It’s from a company based in the Czech Republic that also produces cheap (but excellent) darkroom chemicals. Again, let’s look at a few images before reading more about it.

Image by Ester
Image by An eye for my mind

In case you haven’t guessed already, these were shot with Fomapan film from the company called Foma. I’m sure you are already sold on it but just in case, for the more reluctant among you, I have a few more cards up my sleeve to convince you.

The tonalities of gray are some of the most beautiful I’ve seen from BW films. It’s the perfect balance between contrast and exposure latitude. It retains details in both, shadows and highlights without looking too flat. If you want more contrast, it’s recommended to overexpose it by a half stop.

I think what makes it so special, is the smooth transition between shades of gray. There is no harsh separation, which would normally decrease the sharpness, but that’s not the case here. It gives very fine details without being too contrasty—this makes it the ideal partner for dreamy looking portraits.

One thing you should be aware of is that it doesn’t handle being pushed very well. I haven’t tried pushing it myself, so I can’t really confirm this, but it seems to be a common opinion on forums about that.

The last thing I will say about this film is that you can get crazy contrast and sharpness if you develop it using the “Stand” technique with Ilfotec DD-X developer. If you are not familiar with this process, read this.

I hope you agree that a film shouldn’t be judged by its price; and even if the first impression is often the good one, that’s not always true.

I’ll take the example of Fomapan because that was the most meaningful to me. This roll stayed sitting in my fridge for a while, but I had to bring it along for a photo shoot because there was nothing left. Judging by its low-cost looking box, I had already decided that this film wouldn’t be anything special but I shot it anyway.

A few days later, when I finally saw the first pictures, it didn’t take long to realize how wrong my judgment was. Some of you may have already seen this picture on a previous article, but it really struck me:

The ambiance created by this film really matched the emotion of the model—this encounter with Fopan ended up being one of these lucky accidents.

The moral of this short story is simple: don’t let yourself be fooled by packaging or an unknown brand of film (or camera). Preconceived ideas may end up making you neglect some of the great, affordable films out there.


About the author: Vincent Moschetti is an Ireland-based photographer who is in the middle of a year-long experiment where he’s shooting only film photography. You can find more of his work or follow along on this adventure by visiting his website or following him on Facebook and Instagram. This post was also published here.

Comment