PetaPixel

Hands-on with the Fujifilm XF1: A Retro and Flexible Compact Camera

Fujifilm is a camera company that’s going all-in on the idea of “retro design”. We’re not complaining. Its new XF1 compact camera brings the sleek design of X-Series’ cameras to the world of “point-and-shoots”, featuring a minimalist aluminum body that’s covered with faux-leather. The camera feels very nice and solid in the hand. It’s not as compact as other point-and-shoots (the Canon S110 is around 30% smaller and 20% lighter), so I’d say it’s purse-sized rather than pocket-sized. What it lacks in portability, however, it makes up for in beauty and brawn.

Inside the camera is a respectable 12MP 2/3-inch sensor. Larger than the 1/1.7 or 1/1.8-inch sensors found in many compacts, but smaller than other professional-level compacts that have been emerging as of late (the Sony RX100 packs a 1-inch sensor that’s twice as big).

Other specs include a retractable manual zoom 25-100mm f/1.8-4.9 lens, optical stabilization, RAW files, 10fps continuous shooting, 1080p HD video at 30fps, a 3-inch 460K dot LCD screen, an ISO range of 100-12800, a pop-up flash, manual controls, and a special user interface that can be geared towards a user’s preference (more on that later).

When the camera is off, it measures 4.2×2.4×1.2-inches. Pretty compact and sleek.

It becomes a beast when it’s turned on, though. The lens extends quite a bit when the camera is ready for business. Like the X10, the XF1 uses a twist-to-turn-on feature. You twist the lens ring on the front and pull in order to pull out the lens and turn on the camera. It takes some getting used to, but can definitely become second-nature after some use.

The main issue with the feature is the fact that it cannot be turned on with one hand (without a good deal of cleverness or effort). You’ll need to hold the camera in both hands in order to start using it, which might be a slight turn-off for people who like pulling out their camera, turning it on, and snapping a shot in one smooth motion.

One neat feature on the XF1 is the E-Fn button on the back. If you use a laptop, you’ll be familiar with what Fn means. It’s a button that provides alternate functionality for other buttons when it’s being held down. Hold it down, and you’ll be able to access different functions you’ve assigned to the six buttons on the rear of the camera.

Although I didn’t get to play around with it, the XF1 features the X-Series’ nifty film simulation modes, which can make your photos pop out looking like they were shot on various color and monochrome film stocks (e.g. Velvia, Provia, Astia).

The XF1 comes in three flavors — black, red, or tan — and will cost $500 when it hits store shelves next month.

If you’re looking for an everyday compact camera that offers a healthy mix of style, features, and quality, the XF1 should be on your list of cameras to check out. At $500, however, it’s pushing up into the price range of more professional compacts and mirrorless cameras, so you’ll need to be willing to pay a premium for retro-tastic-ness. If that describes you, then you might also want to think about paying $100 more for the even more gorgeous — and similarly spec-ed — Fujifilm X10.


 
  • 434434

    to expensive for what it offers…..
    they try to sell that stuff to fashion people know or what?

  • Toby

    Retro-tacky-ness. Aside from its technical specs and ability’s, it’s very ugly, especially in comparison to the X-pro, X10 and the rest of the range. I leads me to believe it was designed by someone else, not the person responsible for the others. The tan one reminds me very much of the cheap Vivitar digital cameras, which are far from pleasing on the eye.

    No, photographers don’t buy cameras purely on aesthetics. But when the camera is being marketed as a desirable item based on the way it looks, the XF1 doesn’t do it for me. Second hand X10 would get my money.

  • Iris

    Call me if/when it gets a sensor that equals or betters the RX100 sensor.

  • thosh

    And you Toby, you are speaking for all “photographers”…? Oh boy, please. It´s just your own subjective opinion.

  • Cochese25

    “If you use a Mac, you’ll be familiar with what Fn means”

    Either you’re ignorant to the fact or are just plain stupid. the “Fn” button is a feature on nearly all standard keyboards for years. In fact, my second ever laptop had this and that was in 2007. Five years ago. Most people with a laptop will be familiar with that button.

  • http://www.petapixel.com Michael Zhang

    Thanks for pointing this fact out. Changed “Mac” to “laptop” :)

    Having used Windows desktops and Mac laptops for some time now, I completely forgot about the fact that Windows laptops use it as well, sorry!

  • trialex

    Ah, well as always “ugly” is subjective. I think it looks good, and if I was in the market for a higher-end point and shoot this would definitely be considered.

  • Tony M

    “Either you’re ignorant to the fact or are just plain stupid”. there’s no need to insult people because they make a slight mistake.

  • Tony M

    You’re too kind Michael, should not even respond to idiots. thanks for the article.

  • http://www.petapixel.com Michael Zhang

    Haha, always open to feedback and corrections! :)

    Thanks Tony

  • Jostein Roalkvam

    Bought a new X10 with the newer sensor including a 4gb SD card for $480 including shipping, on eBay a couple of weeks ago. Way better deal IMO

  • Toby

    Yes, it is my own subjective opinion. Where did I suggest I was speaking for all photographers?

  • Roy

    “No, photographers don’t buy cameras purely on aesthetics.”

  • Toby

    I didn’t realise photographers bought cameras purely on how they look.

  • Roy

    Some may, some may not. Some cameras are definitely marketed as fashion accessories, rather than photography tools.
    The point is that referring to “photographers” as a whole while expressing a personal opinion may be considered presumptuous.

  • Markus Arike

    Looks are not the only thing this camera has going for it. It has a fast f1.8 lens at the wide end, and a larger than normal 2/3″ sensor, with likely the same great IQ as the X10 in a smaller package. AND it looks cool .

  • spoozer

    Yea, who wants a camera that looks good. Make mine a brick.