PetaPixel

Interview with Zoriah Miller

Zoriah Miller, commonly known as Zoriah, is an award-winning photojournalist and war photographer whose work has been featured in some of the world’s most prestigious galleries, museums, and publications. Check out his website, blog, one-on-one photojournalism workshops, and Wikipedia article.


PetaPixel: Can you tell us a little about yourself and your background?

Zoriah Miller: I began photography when I was 15 years old and within the first year of shooting I won a national award and was pretty into the idea of becoming a photojournalist. Three years later I was shooting abroad and had all of my equipment stolen…well, actually I had everything stolen and ended up having to spend some time in a homeless shelter until I could get money and documents to get out of the country…but that is another story. The point was that my camera and lenses were gone and I pretty much gave up. I graduated college, moved to New York, was in the music industry for six years, gave that up to go abroad and study disaster management and humanitarian aid to developing countries, hated that and then picked up a used camera and a plane ticket and have been shooting ever since then.

PP: What does your name mean?

ZM: My mother made up my name. She combined Zoe and Zachariah. Zoe is the Greek god of life and together the name means “one who loves life.”

PP: What was your first camera?

ZM: I am pretty sure it was a Nikon FG. I was shooting on an old thing my mother loaned me the first year, but when I won the award a local artist donated the Nikon to me with a bag of lenses. I used them for the next three years until they were stolen.

PP: What equipment do you currently use?

ZM: I am more than happy to answer this question, but I always start by saying that it really doesn’t matter that much. It is great to have nice equipment, and when you start making your living at this I do recommend it, but dont get hung up on it. If your pictures are not good, it is probably not the fault of the equipment. Everything I shot up until 2006 was done with a Canon 10D, and these shots blend right in on my sites and still sell just as well as the ones that were shot on nice, new gear.

That being said, I currently have a Canon 1DS MKIII and a 1DS MKII, 16-36 2.8, 50 1.2, 70-200 2.8. About 80% of my portfolio was shot with the 16-35 and I really only use the 70-200 in extreme situations (war, riots, disasters etc.) I primarily bought the 50 as a backup to my 16-35 and dont use it very often either.

PP: What has been your most memorable moment so far as a photojournalist? Does any memory stand out from the rest?

ZM: Such a hard question to answer, because so many moments have been so memorable, both in good and bad ways. The bad stuff gets etched into your head just as much as the good does. I think the most emotional project and the one that I learned the most from was my first year in Iraq. I learned a lot about people, about fear, pain, anger, kindness and of course life and death. Photojournalists are some of the very few people who have experienced war from a “neutral perspective,” meaning not experiencing it as either a combatant or victim. I think getting to know the soldiers as well as the civilians taught me a lot about human nature, both the ugliest of sides and the most beautiful. It was strange to discover that in a war zone, but for me, that was where it happened.

PP: What advice do you have for someone who wants to follow in your footsteps?

ZM: I urge people to really consider what doing this kind of work will do to your life. It is not just a job or career, it can really change you. There are incredible things to see and experience and I truly believe that good photojournalism can change and enlighten people, but that often comes at a very high personal cost. You wont forget the things you see and you will find that very few can relate to your experiences. It hurts the people who love you to know that you are always in danger and it can definitely take its toll on your personal life. I think people really need to keep in touch with themselves if they chose this path, be sure you know why you are doing it and if you ever get to the point where you cant remember, do something else for a while.

If it is right for you, then do it with all of your heart and all of your passions. Make beautiful art out of the horrors you see and produce work that people will not be able to turn away from. Anyone can take a photo, but producing a work of art, an image or a series of images that will affect people, enlighten them and bring about change is not something that is easy to do.

PP: What kind of dangerous situations have you found yourself in?

I think that a lot of the situations I have been in have been dangerous. I dont think you ever really know how close to death you are at any given point, there could have been dozens of mines I almost stepped on, dozens of roadside bombs the vehicle I was in almost triggered…who knows.

There are only three situations I know of in which I missed death:

One was in Iraq: I was scheduled to photograph a city council meeting in Anbar Province. Photographing meetings is not really my thing, so at the last minute I asked to be taken off the mission. I was told I could not be taken off the mission but I could go outside on the street with the security force and shoot on the streets instead of inside at the meeting. A suicide bomber struck the meeting and killed or severely injured nearly everyone attending.

Another was in Gaza: I was going to shoot a story on the workers who smuggle items through tunnels from Egypt into Gaza. it is an extremely dangerous job and many workers die every month when the tunnels collapse. I had a camera crew filming a documentary about my work and we were slow getting everything organized in the morning to go to the tunnel and ended up running about an hour late. As we were driving to the tunnel we got news that it had collapsed.

The other was in the West Bank: The Israeli Border Police had driven through a small village the week before and shot two young children in their faces, killing both of them. The town was outraged and attended a weekly protest of Israeli operations. The protests instantly became violent and I was on the front lines, not far from several other journalists when the Border Police opened fire on us using live ammunition. I could hear the bullets hissing and pinging as they went by my head and hit the trees and ground. I had one of those strange moments where you really under-react to something. I remember thinking “I cant believe those jerks are shooting at me.” I slowly walked down the hill into a small valley and when I turned around I noticed that my friend had been shot in the chest. He nearly died but has made a full recovery.

PP: If you could go back in time, what would you do differently?

ZM: Nothing.

PP: What are some mistakes you made early on that you’re careful to avoid now?

ZM: Well, I would not call them mistakes, because they led me to where I am now. I think in the beginning I paid too much attention the “ethics” of photojournalism. I was worried if cropped too much or my blacks were too dark that I would get sent away to the photojournalists jail. When I finally began to look at photojournalism as an art it freed me up to really experiment with my shooting and darkroom techniques. I realized that most of things many people think are unethical to do in the darkroom or in photoshop are done by others in camera or with filters and strobes with no complaints from the photographic community. In a photograph it is essential to portray not only the facts of a situation but also the mood, what it felt like to be there or possibly even a bit of what your subject may have been feeling. If you cant make people feel things and connect with the subject matter, they wont care about it. To me, making people feel and making people care is extremely important.

PP: What do you hope to achieve with your photographs?

ZM: A lot. I hope that my photographs make people think a bit about what it is like for others around the world. It is so easy to get caught up in our own lives, we forget that there are so many people struggling in some really terrible situations. I want to make photographs that hit people on an emotional level, punch them in their gut and make them feel something. If people can connect to those I photograph then they can empathize with them. This kind of understanding is the first step in changing the situations that effect these people.

In the long term I would hope to leave behind historical documents, photographs documenting lives, situations and struggles that may otherwise have vanished and been forgotten. I hope that at some point there will be fewer conflicts in this world, and if this happens I want my photos to remind people of the horrible things people go through in war.

Finally, I want my work to be art. I want to leave something behind that will inspire people to not only be creative but to also be kind to their fellow human beings, even the ones who live thousands of miles away that they may never meet.

PP: How much editing or manipulation would you say is too much in photojournalism?

ZM: When I work with students during my workshops I tell them that this is something they need to decide for themselves. Some people will tell you a crop is unethical, others have no boundaries whatsoever. For me, adding things to or taking things out of a photo that are essential to the narrative and meaning of that photo is not acceptable. Artistic choices such as cropping, color and contrast adjustments, dodging and burning etc are all not only acceptable but encouraged. Photojournalism should be art! That is where it’s power comes from.

PP: How much do you travel, and how long do you stay in the places you document?

ZM: I have not had an apartment or home base in eight years and have been through about seventy countries in that time, some of them I have been to more than ten times each. I have had times in which I have been in seven countries in a week. Sometimes I will stay for a couple months in one spot, but my average time on a project is usually two or three weeks.

PP: What are your main sources of income?

My income sources are definitely not typical for a photojournalist and every year they change quite a lot. About three years ago I got tired of dealing with agencies, editors and publications and set out to be the first “independent photojournalist.” The first year I did quite well with making a living from my blog. I offered paid subscriptions to the blog and also asked for donations to help me continue my work. I was surprised at how well it worked. As the economy got worse I had a harder and harder time making a living just from the blog and began to offer one-on-one, in-field photojournalism workshops. I did some fashion, entertainment and corporate contracts and now I do a little bit of all of the above.

PP: How would an aspiring photographer go about following in your footsteps?

Well, of course there are a million ways of going about things. For me it was just about buying a used camera and a plane ticket. I think knowing how to work on a budget is important, I lived in Asia for two years off of $200 a month and did nothing but shoot. It was an incredible learning experience for me, because I ended up living with the locals instead of in tourist spots. I could not even afford transportation so I would just get up every day and start walking, sometimes I would walk and shoot from sunrise until well after sunset. When I would get tired I would go sit with some people or someone would invite me into their home. I think I got a unique perspective by being with the people, all of the time. Now I have money, but when I do my projects I still do them the same way. I still sleep in refugee camps and with local families, in pension houses and anywhere else that allows me to experience what those I am photographing are going through.

I guess what I am trying to say is that not having a lot of money can actually be a benefit in this business. Photojournalism is all about adaptation. You must adapt to every new place you go, every new story you shoot and then when you return home you must adapt to a constantly changing industry. I think poor people are better at adapting than wealthy people, just out of necessity.

For those wanting to start out, buy a plane ticket and have enough saved up to just live on the road for a year or two. Or if you are not ready for that step, shoot in your “back yard.” If you cant find a story wherever it is you are, you are not looking hard enough.

PP: How much do your personal views and beliefs affect what and how you shoot?

ZM: I like being independent because it allows me to follow the stories I believe in and have personal meaning to me. I tried doing assignment work and just hated it, I need to shoot stories that I am passionate about, not technology and politics. So I believe that my personal views and beliefs affect the stories I choose. Aside from that I try to be open to whatever it is that I experience and tell the story that presents itself to me, not the one that I may have had in my head. I think that far too many photojournalists go into situations knowing exactly what images and what story they will leave with. To me this is sad. I think you need to be open to what is going on and document what the reality and not your pre conceived ideas. I have seen so many people miss incredible stories that were right there in front of them because they were too focused on what the planned to shoot there.

PP: After the earthquake in Haiti, there was quite a bit of discussion regarding the ethics of photographing those who are dead, injured, or mourning. What are your thoughts regarding the ethics of photojournalism?

ZM: I think it is important for photojournalists to be truly compassionate. Compassionate individuals know how to approach different situations, they know how to make people comfortable with their presence and they know when to leave when they are not able to do that. It is essential to put yourself in someone else’s shoes: if your mother just died would you want someone to run up and start shooting pictures all over the place? Probably not. But if that same person came up and looked you in your eyes, put their hand on your shoulder and made a connection with you…made you feel and know that they were there to tell your story to the world and show the suffering that was going on in your country, then would you feel differently? It is just about being human…it is not hard, just something that some people forget to do at times.

PP: Where do you get your inspiration from?

ZM: I am inspired by anyone who is great at what they do. I will go to see pretty much any type of art, as long as it is the best of its kind. And it goes for more then art too…sometimes I see a shopkeeper arranging things in a really specific way and I can see their vision, or a janitor who keeps everything just perfectly neat and clean. Whatever you choose to do in life, own it!!!

Music is also a huge inspiration. It inspires me to make images that produces the same feelings in my viewers that music does in me, that connection is so important.

PP: Who are your favorite photographers?

ZM: My favorite photojournalists are James Nachtwey and Sabastio Salgado. My favorite art/fashion photographer is Chadwick Tyler and my favorite photographer to just enjoy images from is Merkley???

PP: Who is one person you would like to see interviewed by PetaPixel?

ZM: Merkley??? gives great interviews and always puts pompous photographers back in their place.

PP: Anything else you’d like to say to PetaPixel readers?

ZM: Thank you for taking an interest, I really appreciate it!


 
 
  • http://twitter.com/stretchphoto Stretch Ledford

    Just visited the “Top 10 Photojournalists” web site.

    It kind of sounds like something from “The David Letterman Show,” and it's nearly as entertaining. Let's play the kids' game, “which one of these things doesn't belong here,” using the “Top 10″ list:

    Capa
    Cartier-Bresson
    Frank
    Lange
    Nachtwey
    Miller
    McCullin
    Richards
    Delahaye
    Smith

    Now, I'm not saying that Mr. Miller, who markets himself as “Zoriah” (sort of like “Sting” and “Bono,” get it?), is a fake, or a hack, or an international ambulance chaser, but he certainly is a profiteer (http://www.wired.com/rawfile/2010/02/haiti-phot…).

    Which begs the question:

    Is PetaPixel part of Mr. Miller's marketing team, did he pay you to dedicate all this bandwidth to him, or are you just a dupe?

    Keep up the, ahem, good work, PP.

  • http://www.petapixel.com Michael Zhang

    Hi Stretch,

    Thanks for voicing your concerns. I have 2 thoughts in response to what you've said:

    1. We published an interview with Brian Auer of Epic Edits 2 days ago here: http://www.petapixel.com/2010/06/01/interview-w…. He's the one that suggested we interview Zoriah, and put us in touch with him.

    2. How would a photographer who works in war zones and disaster areas train others in what he or she does if the workshop weren't in a war or disaster zone? Wouldn't it be like a sports shooter training someone else on the street or something?

    Anyhow, thanks for your comment, and for trying to make sure we're being ethical/smart.

    –Mike

  • http://www.goldengod.net Andrew Ferguson

    That's a lot of venom there, Stretch.

    I'm not going to be that rude, but I would like to hear Zoriah's side of this in the comments if possible.

    Thanks!

  • Israel

    I don't think there's anything wrong with what Zoriah does, but there is something wrong with calling him a photojournalist or his work photojournalism – it violates the ethics standards of photojournalism constantly. That said, it is beautiful and much needed art.

  • SM42

    “2. How would a photographer who works in war zones and disaster areas train others in what he or she does if the workshop weren't in a war or disaster zone? Wouldn't it be like a sports shooter training someone else on the street or something?”

    I think most professional sports photographers would argue that the equivalent of what Zoriah did would be like selling an assistant position to the Super Bowl. Not only would that be unethical, you would likely not be credentialed for another Super Bowl. Further, most sports photographers would tell you the Super Bowl is about the last place to learn to take sports pictures. You're much better off learning by photographing local high school sports. You have access that you'd never have at the Super Bowl, and the opportunities to succeed and fail are unlimited.

  • Pingback: Did a photojournalist really just say that? | duckrabbit - we produce beautifully crafted multimedia

  • Johnny

    Michael:

    I could go on and on about how his pictures aren't good to start with: toned to oblivion, rendering his subjects as silhouettes, not actually people with stories to tell. If he wants to call himself a journalist he should adhere to some ethical standards. But that would be an argument of taste.

    Instead, I'd like to just say that Zoriah is bad for photography and bad for journalism.

    War photography (I shoot mostly daily photojournalism and editorial jobs, but I have a few conflict photographers as colleagues) is not something that can be learned in a workshop that spans a few days. It shouldn't be, and it also shouldn't be something a photographer (I won't call him a journalist) should be selling spaces for.

    His workshop in Haiti was absolutely reprehensible and was denounced by a large contingent of the photojournalism community. Sending young photographers into an active disaster area where simple things like fuel and water are difficult to come by is unbelievable inappropriate, and their mere presence would make the life of Haitians all the more difficult. I knew many photographers who went down there, and once their stories were done for their publications, they left. Not because there weren't any more story to tell (there still are) but because as foreign journalists they were aware of the burden they put on the locals trying to pick up the pieces from a tragedy. He was profiting from an apocalypse more than any other journalist down there.

    On the topic of publications, Zoriah's contempt for the “mainstream media” is completely ego driven and counterintuitive. Hearing him speak about being an “independent photographer” makes me sick to my stomach. Yes, thats great, you aren't sending your pictures to big publications or dealing with editors. But editors and major publications make your images seen by millions and allow stories to be told, and the change you want to see actually happen. Now, the Times, Newsweek and other news outlets can't tell every story, and its terrible that they don't. But a picture published in the New York Times does a lot more good for the world than an overly processed picture on your pay-per-view blog. News photography is a fundamental utility of a democracy, but it seems Zoriah is much more concerned with a pedantic obsession with “not selling out” than with actually doing his job as a storyteller. Don't knock the people trying hard to do good work when the only solution is that people should just pay you directly.

    At the end of his interview he talks about one of his photographers putting pompous photographers in their place, but discounting the entire news industry in favor of wearing the make-believe merit badge of independence smacks of more cynicism and ego than I care to deal with.

    Zoriah gives photojournalists a bad name, and (from my perspective as well as many of my peers) seems more interested in his self-appointed title of “Humanitarian Photojournalist.”

    If you have the time I would check out a video of Zoriah on a reality TV show on the CW Network:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjiC5YvgWzI

    If this doesn't give any insight into his motives and his ego I don't know what does. He'll slag off newspapers and editors, people working hard to make important images seen everyday, but he'll welcome a camera crew to follow him around during a live fire battle so he can get his 15 minutes on TV. Before you try to compare this to Nachtwey's war photographer, I will add that Nachtwey has been shooting for nearly 30 years before anyone made a movie about him and had truly earned his stripes by producing thought provoking and truly humanitarian work.

    Egos like this in photojournalism, which is a medium that should be all about the people in the pictures, not the photographer, really make my blood boil and only poison the small well working photographers have left to drink from.

    Michael, you put together a great blog I like to read everyday, but please stick to the tech stuff. The last thing Zoriah needs is more exposure.

  • http://twitter.com/brookpete Prison Photography

    The “Miller” on the list must surely refer to Lee Miller or even Wayne Miller, certainly not Zoriah.

  • http://twitter.com/stretchphoto Stretch Ledford

    I appreciate where you're coming from Andrew… but, trust me… I bit my tongue as I typed, and thought I was relatively kind.

  • K Brown

    This guy likes himself too much to be taken seriously. He wanted to take students to Haiti to shoot the suffering.
    Something definitely wrong with the guy. Stretch got it right, every word.

    It would be nice if blogs would quit giving him any mention.

  • Zofuckinriah again?

    Is this for real? Zoriah miller? award winning? widely published? When? WHERE???
    This loser has grandeur illusions, and very little talent except for the talent of self PR.
    He is famous for one thing, being a loser. Anyone who's ever heard of him, did so in a negative way. Even his Wikipedia page you advertise up top has been completely revised ans shows how little he is (check out the wiki history for that page). Do you just blindly publish what the photographer tells you about himself?
    This guy asks for donations on his website, while claiming to work outside (and against) main stream media. What exactly can a kid with and enormous ego and close to 0 experience teach anyone?
    And no, you don't need to be in a disaster to teach a workshop about disasters. It's cheap profiteering and completely unethical.

  • not me

    What a total retard!

  • joe tomorrow

    Seems like the same small group of Zoriah haters that are on other photography blogs follow any mention of him online to spew their jealousies… I've seen and admired lots of Zoriah's moving work but have seen little to nothing of the same calibur from his critics. Sad.

  • Aragorn

    This guy is such a joke, I cannot believe anyone takes him seriously.

  • http://www.facebook.com/merkley Merkley Merkley

    epic sour grapes fellas!

  • http://blog.epicedits.com/ Brian Auer

    No kidding, I'm with Merkley on this. Lighten up already. Heaven forbid that anybody do something different from the norm or try to make a living. Zoriah is out there doing 1000% more than any of his critics. The guy doesn't even have a permanent residence because his entire life revolves around his photography career… profiteer indeed.

  • K Brown

    ‘Make beautiful art out of the horrors you see’

    This guy has serious issues.

  • http://mattfitt.com Matt Fitt

    “from my perspective as well as many of my peers”

    YOUR perspective? YOUR peers?

    Who the FCUK are you? Why should anyone here have any respect for what you say when you're too cowardly to even show your face?

    All you've provided here is a stale cut & paste job of the same whiny complaints endlessly repeated by the exceptionally-jealous anti-Zoriah wankers.

    The more I think about it, the more I realize that many (if not most) of Zoriah's hardcore critics remain steadfastly anonymous. Which, of course, raises the question as to whether there actually are very many critics.

    “…I shoot mostly daily photojournalism and editorial jobs…. I won't call [Zoriah] a journalist…”

    Well, personally, I've SEEN Zoriah's extensive output of work from around the world. And it's clear that he puts his entire life into it. And sometimes risks his life in the process. For me, Zoriah is a journalist and an artist of the highest order.

    As for you, I haven't seen ANY output from you, so I can't consider you to be a journalist. Further, your post makes a number of unverified assertions (as well as some verifiable falsehoods). Based upon that evidence, I'd have to say that if you're trying to be a journalist, you're not a very good one.

    Your words do not carry the ring of thoughtful, reasoned criticism. Instead, you sound very much like a jealous, petulant child throwing a blustery, tear-streaked tantrum. Next, perhaps you'll throw yourself onto the floor and hold your breath in protest.

    I probably should've just ignored you and watched as your face turned blue. Yawn.

  • Simóna

    The empty pot makes the most noise.

  • Johnny

    If you would care for a little more context:

    The discussion on Lightstalkers that started much of the flame war:

    http://laputt.com/zoriah-in-haiti/

    The Facebook page with 474 members condemning the workshop:

    http://www.facebook.com/posted.php?id=295183934

    I think my criticism was pretty straightforward. There is a clear contingent of photographers who think Zoriah's actions are bad for their craft. They've made their voices heard.

    And in my opinion (yes, opinion) I take specific umbrage (as do many of the journalists trying to do real, honest work) with Zoriah's idea that he's there to make art. Fuck art, and fuck him. What people need from Haiti, and any other place of misery is stories, compassion and heart. Zoriah's hackneyed overly processed digital monstrosities do nothing to educate the public on the issues at hand. They may look like cool photos of brown people, but they're nothing but a feather in a bullshit artist's cap

  • http://snippits-and-slappits.blogspot.com/ Barbaralee15

    Those of you who criticize Zoriah so hard, might I ask what has been your contribution to awareness of the horrors of man's cruelty to man? Or nature's cruelty for that matter?

    There are many better and many worse out there but he does just fine. So you may not agree with some of his policies or his skills. Why does it mean so much that you spew hatred so vociferously? What good does that do? Nada. It changes nothing.

    There is an saying. Them what can ~ do! Them what can't ~ criticize.

    And then there is… If you can't say nothin' good, shut the heck up.

  • Trilby Becker

    Zoriah is creating powerful, thought provoking work that is groundbreaking and timely. Innovative people defy stereotypes and are threatening to those who are uncomfortable when they do not know how to label them. I challenge you to free yourselves from this limited kind of thinking. If you want to change the world, you are going to have to break some conventions and take the heat from people who resent the imposition. I am grateful that Zoriah has the courage to break new ground and keep his higher goals in mind, rather than preoccupy himself with worrying about who he may have offended along the way. Zoriah's objective is to get people thinking about conflict and disaster, and how consumerism, cultural and economic imperialism, and ways of seeing may contribute to the tragedies of our time. It is completely appropriate that he should borrow from pop culture to make his point. Anyone who says his work lacks artistic value or political merit is blinded by personal agendas. Congratulations Zoriah for helping us to see the world anew!
    Trilby Becker
    Ann Arbor, MI

  • Lorraine Rodriguez

    Regarding: “But editors and major publications make your images seen by millions and allow stories to be told, and the change you want to see actually happen. Now, the Times, Newsweek and other news outlets can't tell every story, and its terrible that they don't. But a picture published in the New York Times does a lot more good for the world than an overly processed picture on your pay-per-view blog.”

    I'm sorry but in these times editors and mass media do not democratize anything. It's the public that has the voice and spread the information viral through different online media outlets free and paid (including paid blogs). I believe your views are as radical as the ones that you criticize.

  • Johnny

    Umm…not exactly.

    The New York Times, CNN.com, MSNBC.com, Washingtonpost.com, nationalgeographic.com, I could go on. What do these all have in common? They're free and everyone looks to them for stories. Zoriah asks people to pay for his blog.

    And saying “the public has the voice [to] spread the information” is only slightly true. The public does have the power to spread the information, but the “information” you're talking about is reported by the mass media because they have the resources and connection to do so. When the mass media fall, the blogosphere will fall right with it.

  • Lo_Crutis

    A wedding photographer thinks that Zoriah is a hack. The next time you are covered on All Things Considered, or PetaPixel, or you publish for Newsweek, or Time, maybe you could bring up your feelings on how he is a hack. Until then we will look forward to your comments on other people's YouTube posts, and regular appearance on Fail.blog.

  • Danjohn3323

    Zoriah has a reputation for making lots of false claims, faking comments from “others” on his photography, trying to make $ off disasters, and generally coming off as a war tourist rather than a photojournalist. I'm not surprised that some negative comments popped up regarding his history of deception and self-promotion and outright lies. A friend claimed that Zoriah has watched the Nacthwey film War Photographer over two hundred times. Don't know if that's true. Haiti photographs on his blog were really good despite his poor reputation in the pj community.

  • Pingback: Link Roundup 06-14-2010

  • http://www.cheappoloshirtsoutlet.ca ralph lauren polo shirts

    Anyone who’s ever heard of him, did so in a negative way. Even his Wikipedia page you advertise up top has been completely revised ans shows how little he is

  • http://www.lacostepoloshirtsonline.com lacoste outlet

    which one of these things doesn’t belong here

  • http://www.lacostepoloshirtsonsale.co.uk cheap lacoste

    it mean that not experiencing it as either a combatant or victim