A Look at 35mm Pano Alternatives to the $3,000 Hasselblad XPan
The Hasselblad XPan is a legendary one-of-a-kind 35mm panoramic rangefinder worthy of its cult camera status, but at over $3,000, is it worthy of your money?
The Pentax and any other compact you may find with a panoramic mode don’t take panoramic pictures by capturing a laterally wider view than a normal 35mm coverage lens. They simply block off the top and bottom of the normal image to create an aspect ratio similar to a panoramic camera.
So not only do these compacts not capture extraneous lateral information, they even further reduce the area of 35mm frame to mimic it. Because of this, it’s very easy to argue that these cameras are not panoramic.
While that may be true, these camera’s “panoramic” modes do have advantages when you look at panoramas from the point of view of composition rather than image coverage — not to mention the cost. Which begs the question: do you really need an XPan?
35mm Panoramic Size Comparisons
For the grain-pickers, let’s take a look at the actual sized of the negatives from these three cameras represented in the image below.
The Pentax is a standard 36x24mm (AKA 35mm film AKA “full-frame”) with built-in masks cropping to the top and bottom to a total (reduced) image area of around 36x15mm.
The Horizont film negative size is 58x24mm.
The Hasselblad XPan film negative size is 65x24mm.
Pentax ESPIO 120SW
Horizont
The Horizon 202 doesn’t have any panoramic optics, it has panoramic mechanics. The Horizon 202 has a traditional 28mm f/2.8 prime lens housed in mechanics, which together categorize the Horizon as a swing-lens panoramic…
Hasselblad XPan
Affiliate Disclosure PetaPixel articles may include affiliate links; we may earn a commission if you buy through one.
