PetaPixel

First Footage Shot with Blackmagic’s $6k, 4K URSA is Predictably Spectacular

Blackmagic announced its modular 4K URSA camera at NAB, back in April. After much delay, there is official footage from the $6,000 camera that’s made its way onto Vimeo for the world to see. And as anticipated, it’s absolutely stunning.

Screen Shot 2014-08-11 at 10.57.48 AM

John Brawley is the man with the honors of capturing and sharing the footage from the new URSA camera; not a surprise, considering he was the man to first show off footage from Blackmagic’s Pocket Cinema Camera. Shared on his Vimeo page, the video takes the camera through a number of situations, testing it’s dynamic range in some considerably rough scenes and making good use of the high frame-rate capabilities to slow down the footage.

The URSA is a great deal different than Blackmagic’s previous products. It features a 10-inch, 1080P display and uses a more traditional form factor, akin to what we’re used to seeing in older camcorders. The feature that is drawing up the most attention is the user-replaceable 4K sensor, complete with global shutter. With these specs, URSA is capable of shooting 60fps at 4K, upping the ante from their previous offerings.
Screen Shot 2014-08-11 at 10.57.28 AM

Brawley used a Cooke 25–250 MK3 T3.7 (PL mount) zoom lens, shooting at UltraHD resolution (3,840 x 2,160) to a number of 128GB SanDisk CF cards. The results speak for themselves. Brawley notes in the description of his video that streaming through Vimeo doesn’t do the footage justice when compared to the ProRes files straight out of the camera.

Regardless, the footage coming out of this beast is beautiful. As time goes on, we’re excited to see more and more footage get released and we’ll be sure to share it with you as it does. In the meantime, start packing up your wallet for its $6,000 price tag.

(via Engadget)


 
  • Bryan Haywood

    beautiful footage

  • marcusdiddle

    Spectacular footage. Minor mistake in the headline though. It’s not a $4K camera, it’s a $6K, 4K camera :)

  • http://www.gannonburgett.com Gannon Burgett

    Corrected. My brain tried to combine the two and it obviously didn’t work out too well. Haha. Thank you, sir.

  • http://www.trusharrabadia.com trusharp

    From past examples, camera’s never going to realise all the hype so at least we got this footage going for it which is great i guess….

  • http://www.thepixelpuse.com/ Aj Meadows

    I kinda wish he had at least uploaded it to Youtube in 4K also. Or maybe hosted a high quality (un-youtubed or un-vimeo-d) 4K version on Dropbox or something as well. Oh well. This 1080 version still looks really nice though.

  • David Fesliyan

    now let’s see it in bad lighting conditions

  • famousfigures

    The first shots weren’t bad enough for you?

  • David Fesliyan

    i don’t know. I’m just curious to see it in all conditions. Are the first shots bad to you?

  • Chris Blair

    Ha, too bad it’s not a $4k 6k camera! Maybe next year.

  • Chris Blair

    Man I hope you’re wrong, but I’ve been tricked too many time before.

  • famousfigures

    Not bad as in bad, but as in bad light. Pretty low light in the wee hours of the morning.

  • David Fesliyan

    Oh I see what you mean. Well, I guess I meant more of a contrast. Something like a sunlight terrible hour of day to shoot. To see dynamic range and all that goodness.