PetaPixel

Modding a Vintage Camera for Digital Use

8001446585_58ed13b238_c copy

My name is David Lo, and I am a street photographer who enjoys taking vintage cameras, digitizing them, and then using them for street photography. This is a walkthrough on my process of modifying a camera.

I have a short list of dream cameras to digitize. They probably would have to be spare part cameras that were not repairable or usable though. My list includes: a Hasselblad SWC, Polaroid Land 180, a Graflex National, Graflex D, Linhof Technika, as well as my own camera design ideas.

7994390248_5b232df907_c copy

Here I’ve decided to do the project on a 1916 Kodak Autographic 3A Special. You need a camera with some sort of bellows, or a focusing lens apparatus. For instance, I would really love to convert a Kodak Instamatic, but it’s got no adjustable lens or bellows, and the back is so small that it would look rather awkward after modification.

A significant part of the experience is the joy of going out and using the modified vintage camera. Plus it gives the camera a “second life”. Its previous owner might have put but a few dozen rolls through it at the most, unless his name was Gary Winogrand, however, you’ll be able to shoot a few thousand free exposures digitally. I think it’s better than just ripping off the lens and mounting it onto a Micro 4/3, or letting it collect fungus on a shelf.

This camera was originally purchased at the now closed Photographer’s Place in Manhattan’s Soho district for $45 in the 1990’s.

7994388900_1902156d6f_c copy

For drilling the hole in the back of the camera, you’ll need the materials seen above. Note the metal drill bit, and the spare M42 adapters. Of course, each vintage camera will be different. On some you might have to actually fabricate a back (sure it is possible, but I would need a lot of motivation to do so, like if it were a camera on my short list or you might not have to drill a hole at all and simply use the removable port hole door on some cameras.

7994387280_807abb0b65_c copy

You can test a camera just by placing a Micro 4/3 camera without lens attached, at the area where the pressure plate should be. It will give you an idea of how the final set up will look. Remember when selecting a camera that the Micro 4/3 will have a crop factor which will increase the focal length.

With such extreme focal lengths, 90, 130, 210, 300mm, all of the cameras I have modified feel different when I’m shooting them on the street. Plus, one cannot focus just by rack-and-pinion, you often are adjusting focus by moving the track, so it’s kind of like playing a trombone.

8000256812_c5a306b83d_c copy

Mark the drill area as well as the center with a soft lead pencil. For some reason, it is very easy to mark and later on place the M42 adapter on off centre. You will have problems later if you don’t center this.

8000255600_dffb4a4842_c copy

Buy a metal drill bit (approx. $10-15). Note that this photo is for illustrative purposes only as I drilled the hole outdoors. You should place a sheet of paper under the camera back as additional protection from scratches to the leather finish. Metal dust will be all over the place, wear safety goggles and doublecheck the direction of rotation of the drill. I once drilled in reverse by accident and the drill almost yanked my hand towards it.

Proceed with safety, and drill in pulses, not straight through. Proceed with this step at your own risk, or ask an experienced person to do it for you for a nominal fee. This is the most awkward and dangerous part of the job. I am not recommending it for anyone but experienced adults who have drill experience. I do this because I have the know-how.

8000252039_a2cd77cd3d_c copy

Drill a little to get the positioning just right. You can see the metal in the middle underneath the leatherette. It’s going to be a long drill session… Go to sleep early the night before, and eat a decent breakfast so you can be at the camera “operating room” by 8AM.

My overall advice is to take your time in this project, as if you were smoking a pipe and reading a book. Depending upon the material of the back, this step may take a long time — or not.

8000251019_f1a06c5b39_c copy

Drilling completed. On the left, from top to bottom: the leather cover, the full circular plate, and the first biopsy piece that came out first. Be sure to clean the opening and the entire back with a damp cloth and some alcohol. Be extra careful of any sharp flashing as you do so at the opening, blow out any additional metal dust between the leatherette and the metal at the opening as any dust that comes out later will probably land on your M4/3’s sensor, ouch! Finally send the bits to the lab or keep them with camera’s medical records.

8000249835_e3e850c024_c copy

After about 40 minutes of using a drill bit that I tried from both sides (the holes were different but at the 30 minute mark I finally cut through to the other side). In this phase I always find myself thinking scary thoughts like remembering someone who shot himself with an elephant gun while trying to clean it.

I know I’m repeating myself here, but the worst experience I had was drilling at night on an Agfa PD Clipper, a real vault of a camera. I had to switch to a high powered drill and nearly caught my hand in the drill on high speed.

Since then, I’ve learned to do it patiently, in spurts. Of course, if you have a drill press, you’re all set, as long as you have experience using it. With plastic cameras, you have to guard against the plastic shattering or drilling too quickly, so there you also have to go slowly and don’t let the machine get too hot.

After filling out the information on your modification journal, you can sit back and relax. What a happy sight! Have a well-deserved coffee and do wash your face, hands, and eyeglasses carefully of any metal dust. Trust me, it’s all over you. A duster nearby is very handy.

8001439323_7caac50121_c copy

Here I’ve taken a break to get a fresh pack of glue sticks. You should use good glue. I’m using cheap stuff as this particular classic camera is so big I’ve decided to use longer M42 adapter rings and therefore I can easily attach/remove the digital camera back. I expect to be constantly refitting things with ease, so the glue isn’t as crucial to me.

8001436616_a02a4fa9c1_c copy

We’re now ready to begin the 2nd part of the process (actually, this is a later photo so please just humor me and pretend I haven’t done any gluing yet). The calendar is just to catch hot glue drips.

8001431296_00f7d95024_c copy

Here I’ve begun to place the 1st bits of glue down. It’s important to align the M42 rings properly. and to just glue a little to keep it together till you’re sure of the alignment. Then add much more glue afterwards. Do be careful when using a hot glue gun, it is also a dangerous tool and only to be used by experienced adults.

8001427049_4b6056cba7_c copy

Testing my finished product after gluing, and going back to my 1st work area after the glue dries. Now I will attach small strips of black electrical tape to light seal the hole. You can paint the glued areas with black paint also at this stage.

8001425626_dfe4279800_c copy

The finished digital camera back. You can totally relax now and use some alcohol and a towel to clean off the glue strands and electrical tape sticky residue, and to clean up or polish the camera. My chief concern here was that the back would be warped slightly due to the intensive drilling. But as it turned out the back fit perfectly.

8001422153_84a910f775_c copy

Fitting on the back armor onto the robot (this is my fantasy). At this point all systems are go.

8001447391_743fe41c2f_c copy

To me this looks a little like armor plating and robots. My imagination is a little too fertile. But, I love this image the best, because it says, I’m finished with my project.

The Lumix Gf2 is not the best camera for this vintage street setup, the GF1 or an Olympus would be much better. Also be prepared to have the thing knocked around as you go out and shoot. The mod camera will be extra heavy and will be a bit off balanced, as the digital back will be like a counterweight, so you may end up getting the thing dinged much more.

I have considered attaching a Leica M9 to the thing. There are a few small drawbacks to this idea though: (1) You’d have to be extra careful or your M9 might get damaged by getting dinged or simply by falling off (remember its a glue gun attachment), (2) the size of the M9 will make your end result even more bulky, and (3) the sensor of the M9 will get dirty much faster (mod shooting is a rough sport), Sso consider the cost of a Leica CLA, ouch! (4) the M9 is itself a showpiece, why would you dwarf a $7,000 aesthetic looking camera with a vintage by way of an attachment with glue and electrical tape, not to mention the problems with alignment? It kind of flies against all that is attractive about the M9, and (5) The problem of actually getting one. Only a fool would loan you an M9 to use it this way. It’s almost like hooking up an amp to a Steinway piano and putting the sound through a wonderfully retro mono speaker.

8001446585_58ed13b238_c copy

This camera is an armful and rests well in the crook of my left arm. When I go shooting with this, I can’t really carry a tote bag or a book or an ipad, this is it for me.

The front movements and aperture knob all affect the photographs taken, it is a very versatile machine.

8001446570_f6a1d7b6e8_c copy

Taking photos with most of these cameras are difficult. The experience is very similar to using a cheap telescope when we were young. One needs a lot of patience. One could use a cellphone camera, but that would be a wholly different experience. Trust me, a modified camera’s digitized shots are not the same as a vintage retro process in an iPhone app, or even the macro programs used in Lightroom.

Check some of my unprocessed mod photos and you will see. A Holga comes the closest, to my eyes, to the mod style. But the Holga will have essentially one ‘look’, as the signature imperfection(s) of the Holga lens will be pretty consistent across exposures.

However, with a mod you have bellows and shifts. A Lensbaby will come close to the mod style too, but the light leaks and imperfections of the ‘Holga’ fabrication are then not existent. A modified vintage will have all of these features, for better or worse, including its relic (reliquarian) quality which is to me it’s biggest appeal.

8001444797_d8a467ba39_c copy

The weight of a modified camera is really important, because you will be holding it rather awkwardly to focus, and adjusting the bellows on the fly. It can be a strain. The best camera for me is the Polaroid swinger. It is both light and hefty enough to get a very comfortable almost therapeutic grip. However, it is very difficult to use in focus. In fact, the way to do so is by partially disassembling the thing! However, even with its frailties, I prefer it.

Here are some photographs I shot using this modded camera:

8002045473_c2ab8dc907_z copy

8027506116_77164feedd_z copy

8020477452_0683b7a8fb_z copy

8020476878_fcdbf7edab_c copy

8020464727_f7990ba003_z copy

8017347859_45c87146a8_z copy

You can find more test photographs in this Flickr set.


About the author: David Lo is a street photographer and camera modification enthusiast based in New York City. Visit his Flickr page here.


 
  • gray

    this is absurd

  • jim

    what a waste

  • osam

    I was expecting so much more.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Steve-Oakley/571133808 Steve Oakley

    thats cool, but I did a different mod getting a ground glass and rigging the entire thing onto 15mm rods like this :) http://www.steveoakley.net/template_permalink.asp?id=587

  • Jason Zeis

    What’s up to the random link to the iPad on Ebay? Yesterday there was a link to buy a Nook, even when it was used in a totally different verbage….

    Am I the only one seeing this?

  • AntonyShepherd

    Eeek! Seems like a horrible waste of camera and time for not very good result.
    All this has done is ruin a beautiful object.

  • michaelp42

    Seems like an awful lot of effort for very poor quality images.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000841381405 Sascha Rheker

    What a waste!

    You combine a decent digital camera and decent medium format camera to reach the quality of 90s cell phone camera in a package that looks like a hunchback.

    It must be art!

  • mike

    1. buy some BW film
    2. put said film in vintage camera
    3. expose film accordingly
    4. develop said film
    5. scan or print the negatives

  • jon

    The best digital mod I made involved taking a regular flat bad scanner and sticking it on the back on an 8×10 Deardorff. It made for an interesting scanning back. I dont see the point in sticking a tiny sensor on the back of a much bigger format camera.

  • hini

    Sorry impossible. For this camera you need a 122 roll film. Kodak stopped producing 122 roll film in 1971.

  • IAM_THE_KGB

    At least integrate the thing into the body. The Kodak’s body is huge, it would fit.
    This isn’t modding a camera… it’s gluing one onto the back.
    Plus, it didn’t even work.

  • http://twitter.com/photoloveLE Christian Bartsch

    waste vs. crop factor – draw.

  • http://profiles.google.com/mjones41 matt jones
  • http://www.facebook.com/stevedemmitt Steve Demmitt

    I knew you would get destroyed…..but do what you like….f#ck em!

  • http://twitter.com/SteveCall5 Steve Call

    If you think Lori`s story is surprising…, 3 weaks-ago my neighbour worked and got paid $6946 sitting there ninteen hours a week in their apartment and the’re buddy’s half-sister`s neighbour has done this for 8-months and made more than $6946 part-time from there laptop. follow the guide here,, ………… BIT40. ℂom

  • Dave

    Looks like the film plane is of the digital camera does not coincide with the film plane of the press camera. Maybe that is why you got the results you did.

    PS: I did not read the article so if you explain why you thought that was a good idea I missed it.

  • http://www.chuckthewriter.com/ Chuck the Writer

    Yes but you could buy expired film, take the film out of the paper, wrap good fresh 120 film or 35mm film in the paper, and then shoot with that. There’s always a way.

  • mm

    or use the other back door for the camera an use wet or dry plates. This camera accepted film 127 and plates. My grand grand father used it wit the modified plate back so it coudl take even smaller plates. Basicaly he used it to spy on the italian pre war world 2 :D

  • Freiscz

    It really doesnt make sense. Shots from this hybrid looks like from my old SE t610

  • http://www.facebook.com/sandervanderveen Sander van der Veen

    I mis the finishing touch… some instagram filter

  • simon

    That’s a dumb mod.

  • http://twitter.com/sidceaser Sid Ceaser

    I’m happy this project brought you some pleasure. Ignore all the naysayers – if doing this brought you joy then good for you.

  • aa

    oh and making a hasselblad swc digital is easy. just use a digital back…

  • Alan Dove

    It’s easy to modify 120 rolls to fit most of the nonstandard Kodak formats. For 122, I believe you just glue a couple of small spacers to the ends of some spare rolls and you’re good to go. Much easier and safer than drilling through the armor-like back of one of these beasts.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bjorn.lubetzki Björn Lubetzki

    just because you could, doesn’t mean you should. I like the old bodies. If you can’t get the film at least give them the respect they deserve and don’t put a hole in that thing and slap some digital camera on there. if you had integrated it and it would work beautifully, which means the images would looks really nice, it would be okay, but like this you have a project that took some time a digital camera, an old film camera and combined it into something, which can only be described by using the word “art” (which can be used to explain any number of stupid things).

  • Author

    My sincere thanks to all who’ve commented here, both the constructive and slightly counterproductive opinions; they are all fine. I’m grateful you took the time to view and comment. As for my own comment to everyone, firstly, these shots were test shots where I played with the bellows and shifts and framed to see what was different between this mod and the other mods i have done. Sharpness and resolution weren’t my goals. One of the items i was looking for was qualifying the ‘density’ of my digital neg, and looking for lens characteristics as I have taken thousands of photos with vintage mods and have developed my own routine and aesthetic with them. I want to see how surreal, filmic quality (motion picture film, not Tmax film) and nostalgic and dreamlike the images could be from this camera mod and what i had to adjust on it (aperture, bellows, shift, M4/3 controls) to get what my Ricoh and Leica digital cameras could not get for me. If you would like to go to my Flickr page, you are welcome and you will see my Non-invasive modifications as well as mods to cameras that were no repairable, and my real final photographs. There are intangible benefits to shooting with these mods. I do elaborate on my Flickr page where I have sets for convenient viewing. The experience of shooting many exposures with a vintage mod is priceless, IMHO. As for this particular camera mod, I have an extra back plate so I can shoot film with it anytime (I think the company FIlmsforclassics has stock film that they resize to different formats). Thank you everyone

  • aa

    mogoče je pa iz polja

  • http://www.hellodeer.com/ anise

    i have all of these things. i will be doing this when i get home. sure, i could just take a pic and run it through a program to do the same thing, but this is fun for the arts & crafts type.

  • http://twitter.com/JohnMilleker John Milleker

    These cameras shoot cut photo paper just fine. Make a template, cut a bunch, put them in a light-proof box and just change out each shot in a changing bag.

  • http://twitter.com/JohnMilleker John Milleker

    I would like it more if you would have just made a fake back, put the original in a safe place and made a template, cut sheet metal or a piece of 1/8″ plywood and rammed a hole saw through that instead.

    I’ve made my share of mods, both digital and converting cameras to accept corrosive wet plates. With a little extra thought protective measures can be taken against corrosion and mods can be reversed if/when you lose interest.

  • Simon

    Actually, I use 120 in a very similar camera (Kodak No3B, model 5B), you just need to build little stilts for the 120 roll. Dead easy. then in order to know what number you’re on simply lift the autographic flap under shade and roll it or get some red plastic to create a safe-ish seal. You get lovely long negatives and the shutters the made in those days were amazing as they still work in all three Kodak folders I have from around that period (1920’s).

  • Shelly

    “For instance, I would really love to convert a Kodak Instamatic, but
    it’s got no adjustable lens or bellows, and the back is so small that it
    would look rather awkward after modification.” Yes. As opposed to what we see here. o_O

    “Its previous owner might have put but a few dozen rolls through it at
    the most, unless his name was Gary Winogrand, however, you’ll be able to
    shoot a few thousand free exposures digitally.” Yes. By all means, what the world needs. A few thousand MORE of these images.

  • http://twitter.com/Underaglassbell Dan Scar

    Hideous images. What and absolute waste of time and indeed a rather nice folder. #FAIL

  • Leila Brazil

    almost 100 years camera destroyed by a hipster.WHAT A SHAME!

  • Robert Pilla

    All of that so you could take crappy photos? You would have been better off shooting yourself in the liver with an arrow.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=1312995208 Christian DeBaun

    Well said Sid!

  • ProtoWhalePig

    Seems like a lot of work to break a nice old camera with crappy results. But to each their own, I guess.

  • blesaster

    why?

  • Phil

    Now that sounds like a project worth reading about. Did you document it?

  • http://www.facebook.com/obsidianfox Scott Alexander

    Come on, PP. What is this garbage? This isn’t even a really nice example of a well designed DIY project. It looks like crap, inside and out.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Lord-Sid-Valera/1783357869 Lord Sid Valera

    what a waste of time… you just ruined the precious camera

  • http://www.facebook.com/michael.a.broughton.39 Michael Andrew Broughton

    what a pointless waste of a piece of history. you could have just replaced the back with a piece of frosted glass, a lightproof box and a diopter.

  • http://www.lenslocker.co.uk/ martin

    Yikes, I feel sad :-( I would have preferred to hear how this camera could be given a new lease of life by modding it to take more modern film, the following on threads explaining what could have been done have helped, but I still feel sad.

  • flightofbooks

    lol ok

  • flightofbooks

    what’s wrong with the images, exactly?

  • flightofbooks

    Why must he shoot film tho?

  • flightofbooks

    huh? what do you mean it didn’t work? his pictures from it are right there in the article. Didn’t you see?

  • flightofbooks

    “PS: I did not read the article” but it’s great that you still found a way to contribute even though you had nothing interesting or useful to say.

  • flightofbooks

    Your comment can only be explained as “art”