Nikon D800E Steals the DxOMark Crown From Its Fraternal Twin, the Nikon D800

It’s been almost three months to the day since the well-respected camera equipment rating service DxOMark crowned the Nikon D800 as its new king, giving the camera’s 36.3MP sensor an incredible overall score of 95 — but now its reign is over. The Nikon D800 has been officially beaten out, and appropriately enough it has happened at the hands of its nearly identical twin brother, the Nikon D800E.

As you can see from the image above, the lack of a low-pass optical filter in the D800E has allowed it to beat out the D800 in every category except dynamic range (and even there they only differed by .1Evs), giving it the push it needed to get an overall score of 96 — one point higher than the now-deposed king.

Of course, as the charts and graphs in the DxOMark’s comparison of the two cameras show, the differences are minuscule and probably nearly unnoticeable to the naked eye in most situations. But if you want to own the reigning king, you’ll have to dig up that extra $300 to add the “E” to the end of your D800’s name. For more info and a full comparison between the D800 and the D800E, check out DxOMark’s full review.

Nikon D800E nabs top ranking from D800 (via Nikon Rumors)

  • Aip

    crazy awesome!

  • J Yard

    If only one could buy the D800. That would be nice. :(

  • tttulio

    Whats the point in making the D800? So you are charged $300 to not have an LP filter?

  • Tobias Solem

    Erm, the D800E is more expensive.

  • Mansgame

    Yeah it’s a bit weird to pay $300 NOT to get a filter. Moire isn’t a big problem so why not make them all e’s?

  • Manuela R. Gatlin

    Moire isn’t a big problem so why not make them all e’s?

  • ninpou_kobanashi

    Study economics much? Also, read up on your missing filter; it’s replaced with something else (^_^)

  • Mansgame

     But it costs more because they build less of them.  If they were all E’s wouldn’t it be cheaper in the long run?