PetaPixel

Why Your Digital Camera’s GPS Might Not Work in China

It’s strange to think that cartography laws could somehow affect the functionality of your camera overseas, but a recent article on Ogle Earth points out that just such a thing has been going on with GPS-enabled cameras as far back as 2010. The whole “investigation” into the matter began with the release of the Panasonic TS4 earlier this year. For some reason the press release cautioned that the GPS in the camera “may not work in China or in the border regions of countries neighboring China.”

But after doing some digging they discovered that these restrictions are not limited to the TS4, nor are they even limited to Panasonic. In fact, many major manufacturers go to great lengths to conceal or toss away the location data captured by GPS-enabled cameras when you’re taking photos in the People’s Republic of China.

Panasonic, Leica and FujiFilm prevent their cameras from displaying location information when in China. Nikon and Samsung appear to restrict location information in some other way. Sony, Canon, Pentax, Casio and Olympus do not interfere with the GPS function of their cameras when in China (or at the very least do not admit to it in their manuals).

But even those last five, while not admitting to interfering with your GPS directly, caution that some countries restrict the use of GPS and that one should contact the appropriate embassy and turn off GPS tracking if necessary. The ultimate question though, is why does this even matter?

Why does all this matter? Wherever local laws prohibit the sale or use of a personal electronics device able to perform a certain function, manufacturers have traditionally chosen not to sell the offending device in that particular jurisdiction, or — if the market is tempting enough — to sell a crippled model made especially for that jurisdiction.

[...] The risk to consumers in freer countries is that personal electronics brands might be tempted to simplify their manufacturing processes by building just one device for the global market, catering to the lowest common denominator of freedom — especially if the more restrictive legal jurisdictions contain some of the most attractive markets, such as mainland China.

For a more in-depth look into this issue (including direct excerpts from all of the manuals) be sure to check out the whole article over on Ogle Earth.

Why do Panasonic, Leica, FujiFilm, Samsung and Nikon censor their GPS cameras? [Ogle Earth]


Image credit: Portable GPS Device – Finished (Kinda) by 3D King


 
 
  • GatesMaura44

    my roomate’s st ep-mot her brought ho me $1 3342 the previous mo nth. s he g ets pa id on the computer and bought a $369300 condo. All she did was get lucky and profit by the advice uncove red on this web page ===>> ⇛⇛⇛⇛► Job2Seek.blogspot.com

  • timon

    Until end of the 1980s,  in mainland China still banned to import and sell the camcorder to consumer individuals.  There are more similar things endlessly, it is not real law order, power rules all things, and controls judicature.

  • darylcheshire

    Not just minimum of freedom.
    The 30 minute limit of video DSLRs is due to tax rules in Europe which means AFAIK that all video DSLRs have this limit.Also the iPhone 4 before iOS 4.3 didn’t have tethering allowed throughout the world because of some arrangement with AT&T. After 4.3 then it was whatever your Telco allowed.
    So there are some other examples of artificial limits to technology.

  • Ivan

     Like DVD region codes :-)

  • AlstonRoberto98

    my roomate’s mom got paid $ 14828 past week. she is making an incom e on the internet and bought a $481700 house. All she did was get fortunate and put into use the guide exposed on this web site ===>> ⇛⇛⇛⇛► Job2Seek.blogspot.com